Talk:2016 24 Hours of Daytona/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 16:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hello MWright96, I'll be taking up the review for this nomination and will present it to you in some time. I hope you will find my feedback to be helpful. Tayi Arajakate Talk 16:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
- MWright96, good work on the article, I've completed the review and could not find any significant issues. There are two minor ones which I have mentioned in the comments but otherwise this is more or less a good article so I've promoted it. Tayi Arajakate Talk 13:47, 20 July 2021 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]- "It was the third consecutive year it was part of the WeatherTech SportsCar Championship and the 54th 24 Hours of Daytona." This line should have an inline citation.
- Since the information in the image caption under "Entry list" is not present in the article, the caption itself should have an inline citation.
Assessment
[edit]- Comprehension: The article is very well written. Pass
- Verifiability:The article is verifiable. Pass
- Comprehensiveness: The article is comprehensive enough. Pass
- Neutrality: The article is neutral. Pass
- Stability: The article is stable. Pass
- Illustration: The article is well illustrated. Pass
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) | The prose is clear, concise and understandable. | Pass |
(b) (MoS) | The article is compliant with the manual of style. | Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (major aspects) | The article has a broad coverage of all major aspects. | Pass |
(b) (focused) | The article is focused without any unnecessary deviations. | Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
The article is compliant with the policy on neutral point of view. | Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
No ongoing edit warring or content disputes exist. | Pass |