Talk:2016–17 Liverpool F.C. season
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Semi-protected edit request on 19 March 2017
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Add a report of the match with Manchester City and preferably just un-protect the page so I could do it myself. 87.126.23.87 (talk) 19:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
- Not done: as you have not requested a specific change in the form "Please replace XXX with YYY" or "Please add ZZZ between PPP and QQQ".
More importantly, you have not cited reliable sources to back up your request, without which no information should be added to, or changed in, any article.
As for the unprotection - this page has had to be protected 3 times in 2017 due to repeated vandalism - Arjayay (talk) 19:43, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Add "On 19th March, Liverpool travelled to Manchester City in a crucial game for the battle for Champions league. James Milner opened the scoring from the spot in the 51st minute, though Sergio Agüero levelled at the 69th. Both Liverpool missed many chances, including a mishit by Lallana from 5 yards, but at the end the draw was a fair result." at the end of month March of the season review. Here's a source also: http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/39246699
When will it be unprotected?87.126.23.87 (talk) 21:03, 19 March 2017 (UTC) Arjayay (talk)? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.100.201.94 (talk) 08:32, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Hello, is anyone gonna make this??? 46.47.83.110 (talk) 11:47, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Done - albeit reworded a little - I trust I'm not breaking some unwritten rule about waiting for the results of other matches.
46.47.83.110 The reason your request had not been answered was that you did not change the answered=y to answered=no at the top of this section. This would have re-added it to the request list, but without that, nobody knew there was anything to reconsider.
As for when will it be unprotected, the current protection - the third this year - expires at 17.33 on 23 March
Your attempt to get my attention failed because you did not sign your post at the same time as you added my name (and I'm not sure whether IP addresses can WP:Ping in any case) - Arjayay (talk) 12:16, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you! 84.238.174.220 (talk) 09:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 20 March 2017
[edit]This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Replace "and Can in the 64th with a low shot t the corner." with "and Can in the 64th minute with an inch-perfect shot which ended in Tom Heaton's lower left corner" 77.85.63.131 (talk) 21:26, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
Still waiting for an answer. 95.42.19.168 (talk) 18:25, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- I am not going to decide this one but "inch-perfect" seems WP:POV and I can not see that description in any of the sources. Qed237 (talk) 11:36, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. JTP (talk • contribs) 18:07, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- C-Class football articles
- Low-importance football articles
- C-Class football in England articles
- Low-importance football in England articles
- Football in England task force articles
- C-Class Liverpool F.C. articles
- Low-importance Liverpool F.C. articles
- Liverpool F.C. task force articles
- C-Class football season articles
- WikiProject Football season articles
- WikiProject Football articles
- C-Class Merseyside articles
- Low-importance Merseyside articles
- WikiProject Merseyside articles
- C-Class England-related articles
- Low-importance England-related articles
- WikiProject England pages