Jump to content

Talk:2015 Spanish Grand Prix

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2015 Spanish Grand Prix has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star2015 Spanish Grand Prix is part of the 2015 Formula One season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 15, 2015Good article nomineeListed
September 18, 2016Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on June 22, 2015.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that with Nico Rosberg's victory at the 2015 Spanish Grand Prix, he became the ninth winner of the race in as many years?
Current status: Good article


GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:2015 Spanish Grand Prix/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Nascarking (talk · contribs) 22:45, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    The post-qualifying subsection is a level four subsection while the post-race subsection is a level three subsection. Both need to be either a level three or level four. I'd go with the latter, but that's just me.
I felt that post-race corresponds to background rather than post-qualifying. That is also in line with the other GA-status articles for this season's races (see Malaysia and Bahrain). Zwerg Nase (talk) 23:47, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm going to put this article on hold and ask for a second opinion on this point.--Nascar king 01:49, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  2. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  4. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  5. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  6. Overall:
    Pass:
    Address the point of concern in 1b and it's a pass.--Nascar king 22:48, 14 May 2015 (UTC) While the subsection note is something I'd advice looking at in the future, it's a minor nitpick that doesn't need to hold up this nomination. So I hereby give 2015 Spanish Grand Prix a pass. It's now a Good Article.--Nascar king 03:22, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! I have reviewed your Daytona article on paper, just need to type it into the review, so you can expect that very soon as well :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 07:57, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]