Talk:2015 Philadelphia Cycling Classic

2015 Philadelphia Cycling Classic has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 2, 2016. (Reviewed version).

A fact from 2015 Philadelphia Cycling Classic appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 15 December 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that each of the six laps of the 2015 Philadelphia Cycling Classic ended with a climb up the 800-metre-long (2,600 ft) Manayunk Wall?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2015 Philadelphia Cycling Classic.

Wikipedia

Cycling Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's sport Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philadelphia Low‑importance

	Philadelphia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2015 Philadelphia Cycling Classic/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Relentlessly (talk · contribs) 11:02, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this. Relentlessly (talk) 11:02, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

"featured as the sixth round" – why "featured"? This seems a slightly odd word to use – I'd prefer "was".

Changed as suggested. Harrias ^talk 11:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No citation for the race's history as the Liberty Classic.
Peloton should be linked in the lead.

Changed as suggested. Harrias ^talk 11:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quite a lot of repeat linking in the body.
The "Entry" section is a bit confusing. If the top 20 teams were invited, why weren't they all there? (Presumably they declined their invitations?) "Of that list" is also confusing – "Of those teams" would be clearer.

I agree with the first half, but I've not found any sources that specify exactly why they weren't there. With it being in the US, and most teams being based in Europe, I assume it was a cost-based decision, and they simply chose to skip it, but as I say, I don't really know. Changed the second point as suggested. Harrias ^talk 11:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"totalling a race length" – I suggest "giving a total race length" would be nicer English.

Changed as suggested. Harrias ^talk 11:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No references for the first five World Cup race winners.

Added references in. Harrias ^talk 11:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No references for the current standings.

Added reference in. Harrias ^talk 11:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This shouldn't take too much work! On hold. Relentlessly (talk) 12:10, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review. My daughter has been ill, so I'm waaaaaay behind on anything "non-essential", so it might take me a bit longer than usual to get back to this. Harrias ^talk 16:59, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to hear that. I hope she's improving – take all the time you need. Relentlessly (talk) 17:25, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Happy to pass this now. Sorry for the delay – I've been unwell myself lately. Relentlessly (talk) 18:51, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]