Talk:2015 Kuwait mosque bombing

A news item involving 2015 Kuwait mosque bombing was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 28 June 2015.

Wikipedia

While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.

Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Death: Suicide Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Suicide task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam: Islam and Controversy Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Islam and Controversy task force.

Kuwait Mid‑importance

	Kuwait portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kuwait, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Kuwait on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KuwaitWikipedia:WikiProject KuwaitTemplate:WikiProject KuwaitKuwait articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Coordinate error

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for

These coordinates are in another country.

The correct coordinates are here (as per google maps)

29.3766007,47.9764741,15z

—83.217.147.91 (talk) 20:16, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that you've emended the coordinates yourself, so I'm closing this request. Thanks for making the correction. Deor (talk) 22:39, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arab Winter and Syrian Civil War

As there is no official title for the ISIS war of aggression, we have to put everything in different sections, but that doesn't mean that there isn't one. The Wars in Iraq and Syria merged over a year ago, and foreign involvement in BOTH of it is a partEricl (talk) 18:53, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Related deletion discussion

Please see this discussion. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 16:49, 28 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

five brits and one irish man?

Why are british and irish people more important than the rest? Seems POV obviously. I might just delete it right now. BeefDaeRoastLXG ^praat 07:12, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The mentioned passage was about the beach massacre in tunisia, where most of the dead (25 of the 38) were british. Reverted.65.209.62.115 (talk) 17:49, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

But why is it important? You didn't actually raise an argument here. In principle it doesn't matter where you come from. It might appear relevant but is it really? Why not mention the people who aren't british or irish? My question has not been answered. I'm actually pretty fed up with the fact that you deleted my contribution going about it like that. You should explain yourself so maybe I'll be reverting the edit now.

PS: I got another one for you: why not mention the nationalities of the African victims of the attack in Somalia? I hope you can understand my point now.

Peace BeefDaeRoastLXG ^praat 08:11, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're taking this too personally, take a step back and breathe. I find the current revision acceptable, but your tone is highly combative and unnecessary; and if you can get "fed up" after one action, then you're probably not the best person to be editing articles at all.

Lastly, the tone you took in your first paragraph touches on edit-warring. Be careful.65.209.62.115 (talk) 07:38, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well "fed up" wasn't the right word if I look at it now but I'm no native speaker. I should have used the word "pissed". I don't take this personally at all but all the time I make edits there's always at least one person to revert the edit without really explaining why, but that shit happens with everyone on wikipedia. And you don't have to lecture me on edit warring. I wouldn't just revert an edit if you had given me a reason not to do so. My tone doesn't stand in the way of a friendly constructive conversation in my opinion but I wouldn't have been combative in the first place if you had shown me the respect to give me a reason of why you just deleted my contribution. I found it offensive.

BeefDaeRoastLXG ^praat 17:24, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mosque in the picture

the mosque in the picture is not Imam Sadiq mosque, the picture is mistaken — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.129.176.156 (talk) 15:14, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]