Talk:2014 in film

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2014 in film article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article has been viewed enough times in a single year to make it into the Top 50 Report annual list. This happened in 2014, when it received 11,067,892 views.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 12 times. The weeks in which this happened:

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 June 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 July 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Years Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Years, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Years on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.YearsWikipedia:WikiProject YearsTemplate:WikiProject YearsYears articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Discussion

People who edit this page may be intrested in this discussion about cutting down on excessive material. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 12:39, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Belle (2013 film), and when to list movies

I removed Belle (2013 film) from this list, since it premiered at a film festival in 2013. Should it be added to the 2013 list on the day it first had a festival showing? It seems a little odd to list the film like that, since in the past these lists seem to have only had things listed based on when they were released into theaters (but it also seems wrong to list it here given that it was first shown in 2013). How should situations where a film is shown at a festival before being shown in theaters be handled in general? Also, how do we decide if a film is listed at all? If a film were to only ever be shown at a festival and never get a real release in theaters, would we not want to list it at all? Calathan (talk) 17:41, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Calathan, you may be interested in this discussion. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 18:41, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That discussion as linked above is what prompted me to remove Belle from this list. It looked like that discussion was kind of winding down since the proposed changes had been added to the MOS, but I guess it would still be a better place to ask my question than here. Calathan (talk) 18:47, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"The Rover" and "Foxcatcher"

The above films should not be listed where they currently all. They should be listed under their cinematic release date, not under their release date at the Cannes film festival. Could we please fix this? Markunator (talk) 17:09, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:FILMYEAR. BOVINEBOY2008 23:21, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not USA Release Dates

I am extremely irked that when I go to the page 2014 in film, the calendar shows the release dates for the films, but for another country outside of America. I wish this to be changed. I want to see the American release dates of these films, and when I see the release dates all jumbled up, it confuses me. For example, Edge of Tomorrow's release date in the U.S was June 6th, but the page lists its release date as May 30th. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.128.119.36 (talk) 15:16, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is a standing consensus to list films by their first release dates, whether they are in the US or not. The very first release date for Edge of Tomorrow is not June 6th, so it should not be listed under that date on this page Eventhorizon51 ^(talk) 20:17, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like to see American films released in 2014, see List of American films of 2014. Remember that this is a worldwide encyclopedia presented in English, not an American-perspective encyclopedia. BOVINEBOY2008 12:02, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I concur. It is idiotic to list films to whatever happens to be their first release ANYWHERE. This is the English language Wiki and 90% of the visitors will be looking for the major release date for the country of origin. That would be the most logical. We shouldn't have to click several more times to track down this info. Because if you are going to arbitrarily list whatever country is first, then you might as well simply list the film's premiere date. Makes as much sense. I know, I know - expecting wikipedia to do something based on logic and common sense is like hoping the same thing will happen in Washington... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.240.124.18 (talk) 00:55, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Boyhood

Why is it listed in January when I watched it opening night a few weeks ago? Feedback ^☎ 19:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

it premiered in January first Redsky89 (talk) 03:48, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Paddington

Paddington is listed twice. - adamstom97 (talk) 05:31, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Done BOVINEBOY2008 11:37, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Imitation Game

The first country wide release is the UK on November 14th. Why is the film listed on the date of September 27th? It was only shown at the San Diego Film Festival on that date which also was not the first showing, if we are listing it by that criteria. 67.253.122.130 (talk) 03:40, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

it was shown at the film festival then it was first shown there. 24.191.98.53 (talk) 07:52, 25 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why Whiplash is not listed here?

"The film premiered in-competition in the US Dramatic Category at the 2014 Sundance Film Festival on January 16, 2014, as the opening film of the festival." That's the sentence in the article.

Thanks, MYS 77 ^✉ 04:01, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added it in just now Redsky89 (talk) 05:25, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A Fairly Odd Summer

A Fairly Odd Summer was released August 2nd. Can someone add it? -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 05:31, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This article is only for theatrical films. Try 2014 in television. BOVINEBOY2008 14:49, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

'71

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/'71_(film) Domestic release 2015, AA nominated lead. Kid Bugs (talk) 00:13, 7 March 2015 (UTC) not bold[reply]

Genres

I think that we should include that there are 8 sci-fi films in the top 10 (Transformers 4, Guardians of the Galaxy, Mockingjay - Part 1, X-Men, Captain America, The Amazing Spider-Man 2, Dawn of the Planet of the Apes and Interstellar) and 2 fantasy films (Maleficent and The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies) --Editor49 (talk) 01:33, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:LARGENUM

I am condensing the dollar values in the highest grossing table per MOS:LARGENUM. Film community consensus also exists for these changes. Note the instructions at Template:Infobox film as well as this discussion. We don't know what Box Office Mojo's margin of error is and there is no specific need for this much precision. The specific MOS language that covers this is: Where explicit uncertainty is unavailable (or is unimportant for the article's purposes) round to an appropriate number of significant digits; the precision presented should usually be conservative. Precise values (often given in sources for formal or matter-of-record reasons) should be used only where stable and appropriate to the context, or significant in themselves for some special reason. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:16, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 10 December 2015

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Hello: Please add this film to the list: Monsters:_Dark_Continent Mutaito4321 (talk) 01:15, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: The page's protection level has changed since this request was placed. You should now be able to edit the page yourself. If you still seem to be unable to, please reopen the request with further details. Kharkiv07 (T) 04:14, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on 2014 in film. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:33, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Men, Women, & Children

The Wikipedia article for Men, Women, & Children says that the film opened at the Toronto International Film Festival on September 6, 2014, but this article does not include the movie. Not that this matters, but the movie is not listed in the "2015 in film" article either. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.57.50.224 (talk) 02:12, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on 2014 in film. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:00, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2014 in film. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20151222163118/http://moviemotion.com.my/lelaki-harapan-dunia-world-premier-at-festivql-del-film-locarno/ to http://moviemotion.com.my/lelaki-harapan-dunia-world-premier-at-festivql-del-film-locarno/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 19:49, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2014 in film. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:46, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2014 in film. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:08, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Genre Removed

Why is the genre column removed? Just because a high school kid doesn't like it you have to remove it. I find genre very helpful when looking for movies to watch. The Genre column for 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 were deleted (Genre was first started in 2011). An attempt on 2015 but was restored. my7thsecret (talk) 10:03, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]