Talk:2014 Redcliffe state by-election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Australia: Queensland / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal 2014 Redcliffe state by-election is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Youtube vid in EL

Seems a tad unbalanced to me... Timeshift (talk) 12:34, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Record Short Voting Window for Redcliffe By-election

Antony/ABC. Timeshift (talk) 05:24, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Newman's remarks

Is there going to be anything in this article about Newman's bizarre statement that closing fire stations for a day was not a problem? Seems to me that it may have influenced the race's results. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Seems esoteric to me. Timeshift (talk) 18:57, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen links to articles from the Redcliffe area that suggest otherwise. --Orange Mike | Talk 00:22, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just because something can be cited, does not mean it is automatically relevant. Timeshift (talk) 00:25, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]