Talk:2014 New Year Honours

Orders, decorations, and medals Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of orders, decorations, and medals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Orders, decorations, and medalsWikipedia:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsTemplate:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsOrders, decorations, and medals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand: Politics / Māori Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the New Zealand politics task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Māori task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

Honours in the Monarch's own gift

Currently the line above the Order of the Thistle section reads: "Below are the individuals appointed by Elizabeth II in her right as Queen of the United Kingdom, on advice of the British Government". This is misleading since the Order of the Garter, the Order of the Thistle, the Order of Merit, the Royal Victorian Order and the Royal Victorian Chain are honours which are not awarded on advice of the Government. Also is there at the moment a reliable source for those appointments and for the appointment of the Rt Hon. The Lord Smith of Kelvin as Chancellor of the Order of the Thistle? They will probably be published in the London Gazette or on the Royal Household website [1] in a few days. Björn Knutson (talk) 00:28, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The London Gazette does name Lord Smith as the Chancellor of the Order of the Thistle. http://www.london-gazette.co.uk/issues/60728/supplements/1.htm Nford24 (Want to have a chat?) 05:28, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinks

Given that Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk · contribs) is a rather senior editor, I thought I wouldn't just revert this edit but query the removal of the redlinks here. Given that both Hagaman and Ballantyne are clearly notable, why would WP:RED not apply? Schwede 66 17:54, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your input. WP:RED states :"A red link to an article that will plausibly be created in the future should be left alone rather than being created as a minimal stub article that has no useful information." The names themselves are of no informational value and there is no indication that any articles will be created any time in the near future. However, upon reconsideration, I see your point and will rv that portion of my editing to which you have raised an understandable objection. Yours, Quis separabit? 21:48, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]