Talk:2014 London local elections

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Politics of the United Kingdom

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

London Mid‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Council results table colours

If anyone knows how to get the table colours used on the cell borders to format correctly it would certainly help me from going cross-eyed! SheffGruff (talk) 13:28, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Details

moved from Talk:MRSC

MRSC, whilst I appreciate most of the updates you've done to this article since my changes, I can't see why you've reintroduced the Details column. In common with many others I dislike 'Click here' type links and it seems much better to use the 1st col to link to the details. In revising the UK page I've found almost universal presence of the detail pages though the naming is varied. Clearly there will be a lot of red links initially but that's no bad thing. Chris55 (talk) 08:51, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I put it back in so there is also a link to each council in the first column. It was misleading for the column to be entitled "Council" and then the link went to an election. MRSC (talk) 09:54, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That's a rather flimsy argument if you don't mind me saying! Anyone who looks can immediately see what is happening. Chris55 (talk) 11:38, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For absolute clarity: the article should link to both the councils and the elections. Sorry if I didn't make that clear before. MRSC (talk) 07:15, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It still did, via the elections pages. Unfortunately now people will be less likely to click on the pages for the individual elections and they may never be filled out. Chris55 (talk) 13:16, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on London local elections, 2014. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140526134800/http://www.barnet.gov.uk/news/article/515/date_announced_for_new_colindale_election to http://www.barnet.gov.uk/news/article/515/date_announced_for_new_colindale_election

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:38, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]