Talk:2014 Griffith by-election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Australia: Queensland / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal 2014 Griffith by-election is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

How-to-vote preference cards?

Doesn't the AEC put up party HTVs on the AEC website normally? I can't seem to find it. Timeshift (talk) 23:02, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the AEC has ever done this for federal elections or by-elections (apart from the group voting tickets for Senate elections). There's Open Australia's Election Leaflets website, but that doesn't seem to have had any submissions since last year's federal election. In South Australia, how-to-vote cards are submitted to ECSA for inclusion in a poster that will appear at polling places (and possibly their website)—could that be what you're thinking of? --Canley (talk) 23:57, 29 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You're right. I was thinking of the 2012 Pt Adl/Ramsay SA by-elections... federally it's been a long time! Timeshift (talk) 00:19, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Much ado about nothing

It's almost a status quo result - and the result is not final. We are not a media organisation and we should avoid editorialising over an insignificant swing. Once the result is final, I will add to the end of Terri Butler, "retained the seat with 51.7 percent (−1.3) (etc) of the two-party vote". This will say it all without taking a side - as the results table already does. As for the loser conceding days after, it's overblown and unneeded when Antony calls it only two hours after polls close. I suggest the IP talks rather than wars with a disputed change to the status quo. Timeshift (talk) 01:43, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Also, Terri Butler has retained the seat, there is no need to wait for an official declaration before we state this. It's universally accepted throughout the political commentariat since election night that Labor retained the seat - apart from the LNP who for some reason waited a few days before conceding. Timeshift (talk) 04:01, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, the official declaration of the Griffith by-election is 11am AEST tomorrow (18 January).[1] --Canley (talk) 05:05, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The declaration ceremony is tomorrow, but in the release above the AEC officially announces that Terri Butler is elected member for Griffith. --Canley (talk) 05:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in shock. :P Timeshift (talk) 05:13, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Griffith by-election, 2014. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:57, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Biased coverage

The infobox only includes 2 parties, and even then, only one gets an image. Sure, we can say who the winner was, but the infobox doesn't even say that the other 9 candidates have been omitted − it gives the impression that they didn't even exist.

I'd like to bring this page in line with the Wikipedia-wide guidelines for a neutral point of view: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Candidates_and_elections#Bias_in_summaries_and_infoboxes Owen214 (talk) 01:04, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]