Talk:2013 Pittsburgh mayoral election/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Adabow (talk · contribs) 03:05, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- I am having trouble understanding whether there is a pattern in the capitalisation of the 'm' in mayor (eg "both had run for mayor in prior elections" and "stated that he would run for Mayor"). See MOS:JOBTITLES for some guidance on this.
- When referring to people you have recently mentioned, you can drop their first name and just use their last name (see WP:SURNAME)
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- A fair few dead links. See if some of these have been archived at [waybackmachine.org the Wayback Machine] or WebCite
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- While the election is well-discussed, there is no analysis of campaign issues or breakdown of results. I suspect this is because there is no coverage of this in reliable sources, but just thought I'd mention this in case you'd forgotten to look for it.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- File:Josh Wander.jpg is from YouTube, I assume from [1], which is not listed as released under a Creative Commons licence. I have nominated this file for deletion, and removed it from the article.
- I think it would be helpful to move the picture of Ravenstahl down into the Democratic primary section; it is a bit bunched up with the infobox and sidebar, and the caption is more relevant to this section as well.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- A solid pass against the GA criteria. I have made a few suggestions for further improvement above. Well done! Adabow (talk) 04:28, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: