Talk:2013 Paris–Nice

2013 Paris–Nice has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 29, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Cycling Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CyclingWikipedia:WikiProject CyclingTemplate:WikiProject Cyclingcycling
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2013 Paris–Nice/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 08:19, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Will review. MWright96 (talk) 08:19, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Teams

"Among the 184-rider start list was only one previous winner of the race, with 2000 race winner" - reptition of winner

Prologue

Wikilink roleurs

Stage 1

The last part of the first paragraph is not cited
"made the early breakaway from the field, and managed to e* xtend their advantage to the main field" - reptition of the word field
"an increase of pace in the peloton caused it to split apart," - I know what it split apart means but separate would be better

Stage 2

"and the rest." would be better as and the rest of the field

Stage 3

"The climb itself was seen as the pivotal point of the day's action, whether the sprinters could stay with the main field before the descent back into Brioude." - needs a reference

Stage 5

"mainly second-category and third-category climbs compared to the first-category finishing climb" - better mainly second and third-category climbs compared to the first-category finishing climb
"some nine minutes in arrears of the overnight leader Garmin–Sharp's Andrew Talansky." - some nine minutes behind the overnight leader Garmin-Sharp's Andrew Talansky

Stage 6

The last part of this section's first paragragh needs a citation
"With 64 points, Tschopp held a 40-point lead over Argos–Shimano's Thierry Hupond, with only ten points left to be taken at the finish of the following day's individual time trial at Col d'Èze." - ditto

Stage 7

"Evaldas Šiškevičius of the Sojasun team was next to hold top spot," - first place
"Indeed, Quintana's time" - remove Indeed

References

no dead links

On hold until all the issues I have raised are checked. MWright96 (talk) 14:54, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Should hopefully be resolved. Craig (talk) 16:14, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes all points have been resolved. Happy to promote to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 19:06, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]