Talk:2013–14 Chelsea F.C. season

This article was nominated for deletion on 18 April 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

Football: England / Season Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	English football portal This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the season article task force.

League Table

Recently 112.79.36.171 changed the league table,but I think the old one is better,so I replaced it with the old one.

Difflink --L smll 13:05, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

League Table

User:Lsmll changed the league table, but I think the 2013-14 premier league table template is better,so I replaced it with the 2013-14 premier league table template.

User talk:neelraxit 20:20, 03 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CL group stage, standings table

I have opened a discussion at Talk:2013–14 Manchester City F.C. season#CL group stage, standings table QED237 (talk) 20:21, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Steaua Bucuresti

There has been some edits about the name of FC Steaua București so I am explaining here, feel free to answer. I would like editors to please stop changing the name for the team FC Steaua București to Bucharest and I will explain why. As you can see the official name on english wikipedia is FC Steaua București and not Bucharest. Bucharest is the english name for the city yes, but that does not give you the right to change name for the team, which is FC Steaua București. This is also suppported by the main article 2013–14 UEFA Champions League group stage and section 2013–14 UEFA Champions League group stage#Group E were the team is named "Steaua București" and Schalke is "Schalke 04". Also this is used in one of the links to this mainpage and these edits destroyed this link since the match is there named "chelsea v steaua bucuresti". Feel free to answer and discuss this, otherwise I will assume no one oppose and edits will be considered disruptive and you will be warned and later blocked. QED237 (talk) 19:56, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am a frequent editor of this article and would like to highlight that this article, which concerns a British club, will mostly be viewed by British people and would thus like to point out that no one in Britain refers to this side as Bucuresti, in fact even the BBC refers to them as Steaua Bucharest. Also, this article is meant to be written in British English and the official English name for this side is in fact Steaua Bucharest.

Firstly, how much you edit this article does not matter at all. Secondly you say that the official name in fact is Steaua Bucarest, then why is the article in the britsh/english wikipedia named FC Steaua București. Thirdly, as I stated above the main page this section refers to uses Steaua Bucuresti. Fourthly, the official UEFA standings has Bucuresti. QED237 (talk) 20:23, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reader feedback: How rich are the club and wh...

86.152.73.162 posted this comment on 22 October 2013 (view all feedback).

How rich are the club and where do they rank

Any thoughts?

SojerPL (talk) 22:28, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Forbes' list of the most valuable football clubs --SojerPL (talk) 22:28, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To me it is not really anything for a season article. Possibly for the team article. QED237 (talk) 23:14, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"League performance"

Hello, I'd like to open up a discussion, formally and respectfully challenging the use of league performance for the table formerly known as "results by round." Is not the league table also an indication of "league performance"? Or the results summary? Or even the matches themselves? By what logic does it seem fitting to call what is unequivocally the results by round section "league performance"? That doesn't even make sense. Italia2006 (talk) 14:30, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please refer to and discuss at the Liverpool Talk page JMHamo (talk) 14:57, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

League table template

Hi.

We had/have a recent discussion at The Village Pump (feel free to join) where the editors modified the sandbox of {{2013–14 Premier League table/sandbox}} to have a truncated transclusion of the table for use on the pages for the current season of all the teams. This has also been informed at WT:FOOTY to get people to join the discussion at village pump. This template is then supposed to be used on all of the season articles. QED237 (talk) 12:54, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Squad, Statistics, Transfers, and Loans sections

I have posted a discussion covering the Squad, Statistics, Transfers, and Loans sections on club seasonal pages over at WT:FOOTY. I would appreciate if you could provide your comments on the subject, and also contact other editors who you feel would have useful input. Kanoch (talk) 02:10, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 7 external links on 2013–14 Chelsea F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 14:26, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on 2013–14 Chelsea F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:15, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on 2013–14 Chelsea F.C. season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:12, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]