Talk:2012 Brazilian Grand Prix/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Nascarking (talk · contribs) 20:04, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Minor nitpick, but numbers between one and twelve need to be spelled out (except turn numbers).
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
The only problem with the article is that Wikiproject Brazil rates it as a stub. Good Article Criteria prohibits any passing of articles that have been rated as a stub.--Nascar king 20:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your review! :) I don't believe that anyone from the Brazil Project ever took a look at this article. I also doubt they are even aware that the Brazilian Grand Prix is in their field of activity, I guess someone just put the box there... I could have changed their rating of the article, but it did not seem to be my place, since I am only active in the F1 project. But I guess it is quite clear that this article is not a stub, so we might as well change it. Cheers! Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:17, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Very well then. I hereby give 2012 Brazilian Grand Prix a pass. It's now a Good Article.--Nascar king 20:22, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:17, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]