This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organized Labour, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Organized Labour on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Organized LabourWikipedia:WikiProject Organized LabourTemplate:WikiProject Organized Labourorganized labour
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of the United States on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject United States HistoryTemplate:WikiProject United States HistoryUnited States History
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject OWS, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.OWSWikipedia:WikiProject OWSTemplate:WikiProject OWSOWS
This looks live very sneaky POV. As far as I can tell, it wasn't a general strike despite the claims of its organizers, and there are RS explaining why not. What should be done about it? Bkalafut (talk) 21:33, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
In (belated) answer to the query above: THIS seems sufficient to document the fact that this was a "General Strike" in intent and form — albeit one that was narrowly observed in practice. Carrite (talk) 01:40, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
There are several RS out there which detailed the role of intimidation of businesses in this demonstration, but this aspect doesn't get mentioned. The article feels very incomplete--as written this article is "revisionist" history. Maybe I'll get to adding to it.Bkalafut (talk) 21:41, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]