Talk:2011 Joplin tornado/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 21:42, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ks0stm's comments

It looks good to me just from reading it, but before I even start actually reviewing I'm of the opinion that this nomination is premature given that NCDC Storm Data hasn't yet come out for May, meaning we don't have the final, official data on the tornado. I'm inclined to fail this for now due to that with renomination being recommended after shoring up the article with information/referencing from Storm Data when available, but I'll wait for a second opinion in case another reviewer thinks this article is complete without the Storm Data. Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 21:42, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just of note, I have also tagged 3 dead references. Ks0stm ^(T•C•G) 21:59, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead links fixed.-RunningOnBrains^(talk) 11:26, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Also, I second the motion that this is a premature nomination; heck, the death toll has gone up as recently as last week. -RunningOnBrains^(talk) 11:27, 4 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Per multiple people, I'm closing this as failed since this is premature. This can be re-nominated in about a month or so, whenever things seem to stabilize numbers-wise. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 04:33, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]