Talk:2010 WWE Draft

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2010 WWE Draft article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

2010 WWE Draft is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 30, 2010	Featured list candidate	Promoted

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Professional wrestling Low‑importance

	2010 WWE Draft is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

NXT is not involved!

I put in info stating that NXT was not going to be involved because of the rookies not being apart of Raw or SmackDown. But someone removed it so no reference to NXT was needed. I think it's needed because the "Rookies" are not going anywhere. But now that I think about it, maybe NXT will be involved in a way by some of the "Pros" being switched to different brands during the draft. I think it's needs info stating that the Rookies of NXT will not be involved during the draft.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 23:00, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Even if there "Pros" are drafted to another brand it really don't matter as they will still be the Rookies Pro.--Steam Iron 00:30, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The difference is that NXT isnt a brand.--Truco ₅₀₃ 03:21, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

JTG

Whilst WWE.COM hasn't updated the section, JTG is staying on Smackdown and was incorrectly drafted to Raw. On WWE Universe Chat it was confirmed that this draft was a mistake and JTG would remain on Smackdown.

JTG's Temporary Draft

While it was for only a few minutes, JTG was on Raw. I think there should be info on JTG's draft snafu. Also, I want to add JTG to the supplemental draft but put it under "()" because it was an error.--Yugiohmike2001 (talk) 22:51, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kelly Kelly 133874.jpg Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Kelly Kelly 133874.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 13:21, 20 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2010 WWE draft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:16, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2010 WWE draft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6LDleY7Lr?url=http://corporate.wwe.com/company/events.jsp to http://corporate.wwe.com/company/events.jsp
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100417115226/http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2002/2002_03_27.jsp to http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2002/2002_03_27.jsp
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090222051450/http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2006/2006_05_25_02.jsp to http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2006/2006_05_25_02.jsp
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.gerweck.net/ratings.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:30, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on 2010 WWE draft. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:24, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]