Talk:2010 United States Senate special election in Delaware

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) event(s).

United States: Delaware Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Delaware portal This article is supported by WikiProject Delaware (assessed as Mid-importance).

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Beau Biden characterization

This article currently classifies Beau Biden as an "Iraq War veteran." At this moment, at most, he is currently serving in Iraq. It's possible he hasn't left basic training yet, so he may still be in the US. Either way, he's not a veteran yet. Based on this article and Mr. Biden's biography, it appears his political supporters are quite eager to add Iraq vet status to his resume. @grog_beta (talk) 06:51, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've restructured the article a bit, and in doing so I've made more clear Beau Biden's status. Wasted Time R (talk) 13:54, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Much better, but the sentence "Potential Democratic candidates include Beau Biden and Carney." isn't supported by it's referenced source. Is that your opinion? Why didn't you include Coons or Governor-elect Markell? 72.94.21.90 (talk) 05:27, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Have added cites, have added Coons. Didn't see anything for Markell running, would seem very unlikely. Wasted Time R (talk) 13:25, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well done. Thanks for that. @grog_beta (talk) 05:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Republican candidate

The Christine O'Donnell article indicates that she is the Republican candidate, but this page says 'TBD' instead. Is there any doubt that she is the candidate? Are sources needed? Please clarify, or update the page. --DThomsen8 (talk) 16:34, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Where does that article state that O'Donnell is the Republican candidate? I think both articles are clear that she is a candidate, pending the primary. – Hysteria18 ^{(Talk • Contributions)} 19:15, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know where this reader is getting that idea from either. Wasted Time R (talk) 00:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake, I did not see the rather obvious fact that the primary is in September. --DThomsen8 (talk) 00:41, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Campaign "nastiness"

The article's section on the Republican primary currently contains a quote from Tom Ross targeted at Christine O'Donnell as the only example of the "nastiness" of the campaign. Should there be at least a paragraph devoted to this, given some of the extensive nastiness in the race from all sides? This article at Politico, for example, points out that one of O'Donnell's supporters made a web ad claiming Mike Castle was gay. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Martian bob (talk • contribs) 19:15, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've now imported some material that goes into this. Wasted Time R (talk) 04:17, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've already tried requesting a photo of Coons

I've tried to get an image of Coons cleared for our use (via WP:OTRS) by contacting the Coons' campaign, but have been ignored. I mention this just to save someone else effort that probably won't prove fruitful.Bdell555 (talk) 07:22, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Section on republican upset

From Larry Sabato: "Despite motivating new conservative voters across the country, the Tea Party cost Republicans Senate seats in Colorado, Delaware, and Nevada."

I think it would be a good idea to add a section quoting some analysis on whether the Republicans could have won had Michael Castle been the candidate. Cas5nq (talk) 18:09, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on United States Senate special election in Delaware, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20091011024356/http://www.delawareonline.com:80/article/20091006/NEWS/91006074 to http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20091006/NEWS/91006074

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:59, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on United States Senate special election in Delaware, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:06, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Witchcraft

Wasn't this the campaign where she was accused of witchcraft and it turned in to a big deal? How is there no mention of that here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schnapps17 (talk • contribs) 15:21, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]