Talk:2010 IAAF World Half Marathon Championships

2010 IAAF World Half Marathon Championships has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 26, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Running Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Running, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of running on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RunningWikipedia:WikiProject RunningTemplate:WikiProject RunningRunning articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:
edit history watch purge tag all running related articles with {{WikiProject Running}} adding assessment and importance parameters when missing find references for articles listed on Wikipedia:WikiProject Running/Unreferenced BLPs adopt an article and promote it to GA

Athletics Low‑importance

	Sport of athletics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:2010 IAAF World Half Marathon Championships/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Racepacket (talk) 17:35, 17 November 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

Obviously the result of much work. I am putting on hold so that you can address the issues noted.

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:
"prize purse" instead of "prize pot"? (Changed (maybe this is a case of an unusual English variant?).)

"through recent form" change to "through recent performances" (Fixed.)

in the infobox use the convert template to add the 13.1 mi equivalent distance (Done in plain text to allow break onto two lines.)

explain that total medal table is for just this edition, not cumulative for prior editions in a note. I am not sure that this table adds much because it mixes teams with individual awards (Removed. This is not traditionally done in these types of competition, so I have removed it.)

B. MoS compliance:
Bhutanese links to a disamb. page (Dabbed link.)
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:
Need ref for: "China's leading athlete was Zhu Xiaolin and she aimed to build upon the achievements of former champions Ren Xiujuan and Sun Yingjie for the hosts." (Rewritten to follow source.)

Need ref for: "For Dire and Arusei – both prolific road runners – this was their first individual medal on the world stage." (Provided.)

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
Need citations to non-IAAF sources. Independent press accounts (Additional independent sources added.)

Connection refused on Ref 10. (This is an image file. It connects for me but it quite large in size so may come back refused.)

C. No original research:
Is the total medal table OR? It is unreferenced. (The results prove this is not original research, it is unusual though so I have removed it.)
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:
Explain why Eritrean team competed separately from Ethiopia. (Eritrea regained independence almost twenty years ago, I think this would be a little off-topic to explore on such a year specific article.)

What was the distance of the mass fun run event? Did it follow the same course? (Found the distances, no luck on the courses.)

Did anyone fail the drug tests or was otherwise disqualified? You report that testing was conducted without reporting the outcome. (Governing bodies and the IAAF typically do not release this information unless there is a positive test or the negative results are of much public interest - example.) There have been no reports of positive tests and no athlete's result has been disqualified – suggesting all negative at present.)

Was there public attention to the event? Spectators along the route and/or live television coverage? (TV broadcast info added.)

Was transponder timing used or was it a video camera system? (From the Chinese sources I have read, I would lean towards the former, but I don't have a conclusive-enough citation to include that.)

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Add to Dire Tune caption that photo was taken at Boston Marathon (Done.)

Add to Penninah Arusei caption that photo was taken in 2007 (Done.)

Add to Yoshimi Ozaki caption that photo was taken earlier (Done.)
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Comments

Just as a side-note: I did find it a little difficult to find much in-depth information about the championships which was outside of the organisers' associated websites. Many other running websites have either just the results or a mirror of the IAAF articles. The Chinese coverage is exceptionally limited – while it is covered on numerous Chinese news sites, they are all identical as they are government press releases (meaning there are hundreds of copies of the same three, plain articles). The comparatively low profile of the event and the fact that it was staged far away from the sport's traditional Western media bases seems to have limited in-depth coverage further. SFB 18:52, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your concern, and I am particularly distrustful of Chinese sources that are subject to government censorship. Yet, other biased nationalistic coverage included:

While you don't have to accept their focus on the slow runners from one nation, you can certainly uses such references to support the details of the event. I think that primary sources are fine for certain facts, but Wikipedia prefers secondary sources, so we should make some effort it use some of them. Racepacket (talk) 20:49, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All these sources are now included in the article. I think the claims supported by the primary sources are generally not interpretative i.e. the basic organisational info is descriptive and the bare men's/women's race facts are similar to using a primary source for the plot of a work of fiction. If you think any citations step outside of this remit, then please do tell me! Do you have any other suggestions? Is there anything obvious still left to be desired in the article? SFB 18:06, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I changed runwashington to usatf.org url, since is was just a repost. Congratulations. Racepacket (talk) 00:06, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2010 IAAF World Half Marathon Championships. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:34, 21 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]