Talk:2010 Campeonato Brasileiro Série A
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Map issues
[edit]The actual width, 325, isn't working with the actual layout. I reduced it to 280, so it could fit, but the change was reverted. Need a resolution, because the map layout is invading the text. RFG17 (talk) 17:53, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
Standings and Tiebreaker criteria
[edit]Tie breaker criteria format in Brazilian Football. (Source in Portuguese)
If there is a tie in points between two clubs, the tiebreakers criteria will be applied in the following order:
- Number of wins
- Goal difference
- Goals Scored
- Direct confrontation
- Number of Red Cards
- Number of yellow cards
-- Leonard (187.115.225.185 (talk) 15:20, 26 August 2010 (UTC))
Copa Libertadores berths
[edit]From Article 7, section A of the regulations:
- "Art. 7o – A classificação de clubes do campeonato para a Copa Libertadores de 2011 obedecerá aos critérios seguintes:
- a) No caso da Copa Libertadores de 2010 ser conquistada por um clube brasileiro, estarão classificados os quatro primeiros colocados do campeonato, sendo que os 1o e 2o classificados acessarão a Copa Libertadores na sua 2a Fase e os 3o e 4o classificados acessarão a Copa Libertadores na sua 1a Fase (Fase Preliminar);"
Translated:
- If the 2010 Copa Libertadores is won by a Brazilian club, the first four teams in the standings will qualify, with the 1st and 2nd going to the Second Stage, and the 3rd and 4th going the First Stage."
The same thing happened during the 2006 season for the 2007 Copa Libertadores. In fact, it happens every year. The country from which the defending champ comes from gets the lowest Second Stage berth made into a First Stage berth. That's why the 2010 Libertadores had two Argentine teams in the First Stage, and the 2009 Libertadores had two Ecuadorian teams in the First Stage, and the 2008 Libertadores had two Argentine clubs in the First Stage, and so on. Digirami (talk) 00:35, 29 August 2010 (UTC) In the Artikle only the 3rd is qualified for CL-1st stage 89.144.249.77 (talk) 04:55, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
About Herrera's goals
[edit]Data from September 25, 2010. Germán Herrera scored the following:
May 8th - 88' against Santos
May 22th - 72' against Goiás
May 30th - 34' (penalty) against Vasco da Gama
June 2nd - 11' against Atlético Paranaense
August 7th - 41' against Atlético Mineiro
August 7th - 70' (penalty) against Atlético Mineiro
September 4th - 20' against Grêmio
September 22nd - 54' against Vasco da Gama
RFG17 (talk) 23:32, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on 2010 Campeonato Brasileiro Série A. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090228202022/http://www.cbf.com.br/seriea/ to http://www.cbf.com.br/seriea/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:53, 18 June 2017 (UTC)