Talk:2009 Nikon SuperGP

Motorsport: A1 Grand Prix taskforce Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Motorsport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorsport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MotorsportWikipedia:WikiProject MotorsportTemplate:WikiProject Motorsportmotorsport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the A1 Grand Prix taskforce (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Queensland / Motorsport Low‑importance

	Australia portal 2009 Nikon SuperGP is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian motorsport (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

New content

Most, if not all of the new content belongs on the main article, rather than the 2009 edition page, and its still a long way from NPOV. --Falcadore (talk) 01:48, 11 February 2010 (UTC) COntent relating to the events future belong either on Nikon Indy 300, or V8 Supercar Challenge, possibly on the Surfers Paradise Street Circuit. There has not been any mention made for example of the track reducing in size to roughly half its present length. also any sentence which needs the word 'allegedly', needs a citation. The usage of attack website like Supergpsucks genuinely fails reliable website criteria. --Falcadore (talk) 01:55, 11 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]