This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Big 12 Conference, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the American college athletic conference on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Big 12 ConferenceWikipedia:WikiProject Big 12 ConferenceTemplate:WikiProject Big 12 ConferenceBig 12 Conference articles
Twice I have removed three headers from the CFB Schedule Entry template-generated schedule table. The added headers were for (1) non-conference games, (2) conference games and (3) bowl game. These headers are not included in the primary template for yearly college football pages, and are thus not standard, nor required. Furthermore, all three game types are already indicated by elements included in the CFB Schedule Entry template. Non-conference games are indicated with an asterisk after the date, automatically inserted by the Template by design when the flag is set to yes (| nonconf = yes). Conference games are then logically indicated by the lack of the asterisk when that field is left blank. The bowl game is identified when the Game Name attribute (| gamename = ) is filled in with the name (and wikilink) of the bowl game. Finally, it is also worth noting that if a team's seasonal non-conference games are not scheduled in a single block, the games listed schedule display will either be shown out of chronological order, or the table will have repeating table header names as the conference and non-conference slates flop back and forth. To sum up, the headers are non-standard, are redundant to information already provided through the template, and are thus unnecessary. Fjbfour (talk) 10:54, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]