Talk:2009 Mahoran status referendum

A news item involving 2009 Mahoran status referendum was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 30 March 2009.

Wikipedia

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa: French Africa Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by French Africa work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Missing information

So what was the status of Mayotte before the referendum? Kaldari (talk) 15:37, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mayotte in the EU

When Mayotte becomes an overseas department, equivalent in status to Guadeloupe, Martinique, French Guiana, and Reunion, it will presumably also become part of European Union, like them. It seems to me that the "Referendum Implications" section needs some mention of Mayotte becoming part of the EU, and what problems, if any, this poses. Sonitus (talk) 18:32, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Context needed right at the top

The very beginning of the article needs to explain the difference between the former status and the status that was approved. From my US perspective, I am hazily guessing that the move from collectivity to department is similar to an upgrade from a Territory of the United States to a United States State? Tempshill (talk) 23:40, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. Thierry Caro (talk) 10:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Question about an sentence in the intro

Hello all,

I have a question about the sentence in the intro:

Mayotte would not have become a DOM and a ROM but would only have had a single assembly; the four other existing DOM-ROM will have the option of changing their status to this format as well.

The sentence seems to say that Martinique, Guadeloupe, Reunion, and Fr. Guiana will have the chance to vote on merging their Regional (ROM) and General (DOM) Assemblies into one body. However this fails to note that Guadeloupe and Martinique voted on a similar proposal in 2003. Both islands rejected this. Should this then, be noted? (for details, see [1]) I hope this helps. - Thanks, Hoshie 04:22, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Abolition of polygamy

Will the abolition of polygamy require the annulment of existing polygamous marriages or simply prohibit the formation of future ones? While doubtless framed as a liberal move to protect women (and it quite possibly is), if it's the former then this would seem like a particularly draconian retroactive bit of legislation, and I wonder if it could be subject to ECHR challenge (and if anyone has suggested this). Our article on ex post facto laws states that in France, "any ex post facto criminal law may be applied only if the retroactive application benefits the accused person" (e.g. if it decreases sentences retroactively). How do they square this with annulling validly instituted marriages if that is indeed the intention? I think this article needs more detail about the implications for polygamy. 82.32.186.24 (talk) 14:24, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mahoran status referendum, 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090202131844/http://lagazettedescommunes.com/actualite/32077/decentralisation/outre_mer_departementalisation_mayotte_debut_campagne_explication.htm to http://www.lagazettedescommunes.com/actualite/32077/decentralisation/outre_mer_departementalisation_mayotte_debut_campagne_explication.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:56, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]