Jump to content

Talk:2008 invasion of Anjouan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2008 invasion of Anjouan has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 6, 2008Good article nomineeListed
July 31, 2008WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
October 4, 2008Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

Unsigned

[edit]

Military fugures by the BBC quote that 450 Comorian troops have landed on Anjouan, with an additional AU force of 1,500 including Sudanese and Tanzanian troops. I Think the figures should be changed until further information is available.


France

[edit]

According to this item (http://afp.google.com/article/ALeqM5jnlBDE3zgOEtfeXmIdpRdmy7w7KA), cited in the article, France is also providing logistical support for the AU and Comoros. Aas such they should be listed in the chart like Libya. 141.166.157.190 (talk) 18:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

do it :) --TheFEARgod (Ч) 19:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how 141.166.152.165 (talk) 22:24, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind, I figured it out 141.166.152.165 (talk) 22:26, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


The US provided support too, yet the text does not mention it. Coincidence? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.94.8.211 (talk) 22:23, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are Sudan, Senegal, & Libya actually participating?

[edit]

The article only says that these countries offered assistance, not that they are assisting. If they aren't involved in the present operation, they should be removed from the list of belligerents. 141.166.230.9 (talk) 03:45, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard the above, I have seen the updated news stories. 141.166.154.255 (talk) 02:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invasion??

[edit]

Why is it called invasion? This operation is not like a country invading another country, but a country fighting with its rebel region with the assistance of an international organization. I think the use of "invasion" should be refrained. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikiturk (talk • contribs) 20:48, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invasion = "An invasion is a military action consisting of armed forces of one geopolitical entity entering territory controlled by another such entity, generally with the objective of either conquering territory, altering the established government, or a combination thereof." This op clearly meets this definition. Anjouan was controlled by the rebels, who were a de facto political entity. 141.166.241.20 (talk) 22:07, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

However: the wording rebels should IMO avoided here. --213.155.231.26 (talk) 10:45, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why, Bacar was outlawed by the government, took control of the island, and toyed with the idea of declaring independence. That seems sufficient to say that he was rebelling against the Comoran government and that hence he was a rebel. 141.166.154.255 (talk) 02:58, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Page merge

[edit]

Oppose merge for now. At this point, let's see how this thing plays out over the next week or two, and if nothing much happens, then we should merge '2008 invasion of Anjouan' into the general Anjouan page. However, if things get messy (more resistance, etc), then it could be a separate article, depending on what takes place. We'll know very soon though. Cheers! --RobNS 02:47, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It should not be merged under any circumstances. It's a military operation, and we ALWAYS have separate articles for those. —Nightstallion 10:29, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
who asked merge?? I put a tag to Anjouan in order to merge info from Anjouan#African_Union_invasion_of_Anjouan into HERE.--TheFEARgod (Ч) 12:36, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, that's what this is about -- yes, THAT should happen. —Nightstallion 15:10, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Nightstallion - no merge, now or ever. RIVA02906 (talk) 05:42, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Why merge? otherwise the page will be longer than most which have been marked as too long —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.13.35.7 (talk) 05:17, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mohamed Bacar travestite or Trans-sexual?

[edit]

"Mohamed Bacar has been spotted in the village of Sadanpoini (...) it seems, according to various sources, that he is dressed as a woman ” —Abdourahim Said Bacar, Comoran Government Spokesman. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.196.150.157 (talk) 11:48, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, I think he did it just to escape. FFMG (talk) 12:41, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article Review

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Good job, covers the subject in great detail and fulfills the rest of the good article criteria. Hello32020 (talk) 02:51, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. MkativerataCCI (talk) 18:51, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 21:34, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag African Union.svg Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Flag African Union.svg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:45, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on 2008 invasion of Anjouan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

☒N An editor has determined that the edit contains an error somewhere. Please follow the instructions below and mark the |checked= to true

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:19, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2008 invasion of Anjouan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:20, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:2008_invasion_of_Anjouan&oldid=1229806016"