Talk:2008 Vermont elections

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Vermont Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Vermont portal This article is supported by WikiProject Vermont (assessed as Low-importance).

Campaigns

Presumably the campaigns are included in the other election articles, so they wouldn't need to be duplicated here, right? Just hoping to confine this to the WP:TOPIC. Student7 (talk) 15:42, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Purpose of page?

The first section is very wandering/not relevant. This page contains no actual information about who was running for what office and what the results were. Stating that all offices in Vermont have 2 year terms isn't really relevant and could be posted on Vermont elections 2006, vermont elections 2010,etc. I'm almost certain the turnout data is wrong. http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Vermont_Democratic_primary,_2008 http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Vermont_Republican_primary,_2008 Both these pages show about 200,000 people turned out for the primaries. The source that states a 9.5% turnout is a dead link. I'm merging/copypasta'ing the data from both those pages since there is no other relevant information on this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tunafizzle (talk • contribs) 23:18, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There has to be a governing page to match national template so that interested readers can "get to" the highest level article for 2008 in a state. The article has to be standalone. Not everyone immediately knows before coming to this page, what elections are covered. So, yes, each article has to have the same preface in it covering elections. Or a similar preface/lead. Student7 (talk) 23:38, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is no such thing as a "dead" link where the url has expired and there is a hard copy ref. All that happens is the dead url is erased. The soft copy was only for short term checking by other editors anyway. They always "expire". Papers don't keep them online forever. Student7 (talk) 23:43, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Vermont elections, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080509183202/http://www.pollster.com/08-VT-Dem-Pres-Primary.php to http://www.pollster.com/08-VT-Dem-Pres-Primary.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:44, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]