Talk:2008 United States Senate election in Oregon

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Oregon: Government Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oregon Government & Politics Workgroup.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) event(s).

Approval Rating

I think the page looks better witht he approval ratings of Smith. I took the idea off the West Virginia 2006, 2008 Senate Elections. In time, I intend to make each 2008 page look like this, approval wise. Politics rule 21:45, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S Let me know what you think on my talk!

Oregon's primary

Where did the election tally come from? Every single media in Oregon had Merkeley beating Novick by 47% to 41%, with a 17,000 vote margin. —Micahbrwn (talk) 01:05, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added the citation. Feel free to update, it's even closer now... --Esprqii (talk) 02:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Polling

Why are we keeping the polls for Novick against Smith with Fronmeyer. These candiates have dropped out, and it's a waste of space. America69 (talk) 17:56, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

By that argument why keep any polls more than a couple months old when there is new polling? I suggest old polling be kept for now even if irrelevant to predicting the current race because it shows what the situation was at that point in time.Bdell555 (talk) 06:50, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on United States Senate election in Oregon, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081127013047/http://www.jeffmerkley.com/2007/08/oregon_house_sp.php to http://www.jeffmerkley.com/2007/08/oregon_house_sp.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:29, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on United States Senate election in Oregon, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on United States Senate election in Oregon, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20070623102336/http://www.kgw.com/sharedcontent/APStories/stories/D8Q26JEO0.html to http://www.kgw.com/sharedcontent/APStories/stories/D8Q26JEO0.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:49, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]