Talk:2008 Glenrothes by-election

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Scotland Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics of the United Kingdom Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Speculation

I think that we need to keep all the 'speculation' to an absolute minimum, or omit it altogether. You know that it will only lead to edit warring.

Is reporting idle (or more likely, malicious) newspaper 'speculation' really what Wikipedia articles are about? Nope! --Mais oui! (talk) 10:03, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which parts do you think fall under idle speculation? Perhaps the thoughts on the date of the election, but you must concede that this has been very widely discussed and is worthy of mention. To some extent, the potential candidates, but this can easily be reworked and made more accurate as selections are made. The only part which could really be called idle speculation is on the Lib Dem/SNP vote interaction, and I'm coming round to agreeing that this might be better removed. Warofdreams talk 11:42, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fairy nuff. 'Analysis' of how the eventual Lib Dem vote (whether good, bad or indifferent) is going to affect the final result between the two 'big boys' is always going to be pure hot air. Such 'analysis' (almost always hopelessly partisan and wildly inaccurate) is best kept to blogs and newspaper comment threads. --Mais oui! (talk) 11:49, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion polls ?

At this date, have there been any ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.242.171.39 (talk) 16:20, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008 results gone?

Looks like people have somehow deleted results and doubled the 05 result, but for future reference, the percentages are as follows, with rough votes (just to make filling in %ages easier.) 19000 55.1
13000 36.6
1380 3.8
950 2.6
200 0.6
296 0.8
117 0.3
87 0.2

If that helps the editors in any way... --Woodgreener (talk) 01:06, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If redirects are anything to go by, the senior citizens party is the same as the pensioners party last time. PatGallacher (talk) 01:49, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Postal votes?

What percentage of postal votes were involved in the result? I cant find any data to tell what amount of postal votes were used in the final tally. also what percentage of postal votes went to Labour? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.165.73.245 (talk) 08:19, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is not possible to get this infomation, especially the specific number of votes given to Labour. The Council may be able to supply you with postal vote numbers. however, if you contact them doktorb _words^deeds 09:01, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Glenrothes by-election, 2008. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:32, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]