Jump to content

Talk:2007 in television

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

What about cable shows? Dexter and the Tudors are not listed as shows that premiered in 2007 Seantpainter 08:47, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Do we really need a 2007 page this early? It's still January 2006, after all. BillyH 20:07, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just put the {{unreferenced|date=August 2006}} tag on this thing. Some of those show titles sound suspicious. User:Zoe|(talk) 02:52, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've reremoved the following entry, whose title get no Google hits. Please check its spelling and provide a reference before readding it. ×Meegs 15:42, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Autumn - Keankhi Asldons (anime) on Kids' WB produced by 4Kids Entertainment, Twister Thunder and Konmani

References?

[edit]

why is there a cite references tag when there is nothing on this page that even mentions a single show.. all it says is that portugal will have some tv anniversary thingie. -24.92.41.95 03:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It must have stayed since before the article was split. I removed it.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 15:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tables

[edit]

The columns in the tables are the reverse of those on the 2006 in television page; I suggest they be changed (i.e. the date should be on the left). Furthermore, earlier years do not use the tables at all - maybe a style should be decided on? Scott 22:48, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

I think we should kill the tables outright and just use the listing system all the other year pages use. The tables are fidgety and pointless. Especially if you're moving info between pages. Kripto 01:34, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just as an FYI, a new format for the "years in television" pages was discussed about a year and a half ago here. Please take a look at 1976 in television, where this new format was implemented, as well as at before 1925 in television, and at 1925 through 1930. Feel free to improve or scrap that proposal altogether, because people obviously lost interest then. Just don't nicely format the most recent three or so years while leaving the rest of the series rot in their inconsistency.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 13:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I believe it is makes the page look more organized with the tables, but the 2006 ones look better than this one... (Tigerghost 15:21, 25 January 2007 (UTC))[reply]
Just wanted to say that I do not like the pages that separate Month and Day into separate table columns. Krypto has a point though - the listing system is fine. Perhaps have the date on one line with the event(s) as bullet points? Scott 23:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

this key picture and this game of cat and mouse o and your out of date copyrights

[edit]

The Copyrigths of yahoo,aol,msn,googlesand of course don't forget the 1033,1995 -2002 out of date microsoft. Wizards . Oop's cannot find this page! try again later this is looks like bs this is abouit this blank when you find yourself in a vine or maybe your the one who needs the help watch or follow the your wizards out of date internet explorer. Free to worldwide tv online bs Alberto jimenez Jmnzx582@aol.com or if what i'm going to block you to graphic for who the peoplew to find out the true —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.107.129.51 (talk) 06:04, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nick GAS

[edit]

Should we add that Nick Gas will go off the air and Noggin and The N will spilt? GD1223

Queen visits USA?

[edit]

Why on earth is this event listed (under May)? Just because it made the news? This is just crazy. Surely only significant televisual events should be listed?
--82.17.144.64 (talk) 20:48, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]