Jump to content

Talk:2007 Wimbledon Championships

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Seeding

[edit]

Delete at least the men's seeds.....we have no idea what they will be.

Language

[edit]

"Rain, rain, again rain"... is this encyclopedical language?!?!!? --Attilios 08:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Day11

[edit]

A)Why are Henin and Roddick in bold on the Seeded player knock out bit?

B)Whats all this about Roddick winning but some post match rain delay meaning he didn't and then lost. If he won three sets he won, rain afterwards or not. I've not seen anything about it anywhere and unless someone can find a reference I will remove it.

JimmyMac82 22:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Improving this article

[edit]

Claim: this article is a mess.

After getting a flurry of edits during the Championships, this article has become an information dump. It lacks any coherent plan, has too much narrative in some places, and too little in others. I've flagged this article at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Tennis and would like to turn it into an example of best practices for a Grand Slam article before the 2007 US Open begins.

Before going to the chopping block, here are a few of the problems I see:

  • The introduction should be expanded. For example, it might deign to mention that Venus was the Women's Singles champion...
  • The "Timeline" and "Day by Day" sections are completely redundant.
  • The "Chokes and comebacks" section is random. Why are early round chokes and comebacks notable? If they are notable, they should be made part of a larger narrative.
  • "Prize Money" should be incorporated into the introduction.
  • "Day by Day" should be seriously trimmed, or incorporated into a more natural narrative elsewhere.
  • The "Men's singles" / "Women's singles" / ... sections need to be expanded. "Day 9" gets nine sentences, but "Women's singles" only gets one in tiny font?
  • "Seeds", is this section necessary in this article? It could be incorporated into the "Men's singles" and "Women's singles" sections, or removed entirely, since this information is available in the individual draw pages anyway.
  • "Media coverage". This information is irrelevant after the tournament, so it should be deleted.
  • I like the "Gallery" section. Perhaps it could expand?
  • The templates included at the bottom are good.

--dantheox 20:48, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's also incredibly biased in favour of the Williams sisters. Can somebody tone this down please? Not trying to undermine Venus' success, but her success was immensely fortunate and arguably more of a result of her opponents inability to close out matches when they had momentum than her own skill. 86.134.81.236 14:12, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edition

[edit]

Hi everybody! Maybe you should look for Edition I think it should be 131st not 121st —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.126.85.141 (talk) 08:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2007 Wimbledon Championships. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:02, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2007 Wimbledon Championships. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:38, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 2007 Wimbledon Championships. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on 2007 Wimbledon Championships. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:2007_Wimbledon_Championships&oldid=1196507199"