Jump to content

Talk:2007 Copa Libertadores

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Match Format

[edit]

February 9, 2006
Atlético Nacional 1–0 Rosário Central Atanasio Girardot Medellín
February 15, 2006
Cerro Porteño 0–0 Palmeiras Pablo Rojas Asunción

Which format should be used for this article, the first or the second? MicroX 22:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It should be the first one Energyfreezer
But wouldn't that first one make the article too big in the end. There's 4 teams in each group. Each team plays each other team twice and there are 8 groups and after that is the knockout phase. MicroX 04:43, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you check carefully, they are about the same size, so it will be twice as long, but it is way easier (and fun) to read.
Not exactly. The first one counts for one game. The second shows the results of two different games. MicroX 04:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Qualified Teams

[edit]

I think the qualified teams section should be erased. None of the the other articles have them and it takes up a lot of space. MicroX 04:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

somebody edit that bracket

[edit]

If I knew a little bit more HTML i would do it myself. The teams don't follow through in the quarterfinal/semifinal bracket. Somebody just has to switch two matches around. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jorge87 (talkcontribs)

There's no way they can follow, as Conmebol altered the brackets due to two teams of same country being in semifinals. There are a side note at the brackets that indicate that. Garavello 04:54, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it seems they were afraid of Brasil dominating the Libertadores... EmilioVolz 14:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:10, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:10, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:10, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:10, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:10, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on 2007 Copa Libertadores. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:06, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]