Talk:2006 Washington Initiative 937

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Someone's opinion

Kill it.Xizes 18:56, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does the Seattle Times oppose I-937?

The Seattle Times is a pluralistic newspaper. For many issues, it features opinions from both sides. The presence of an opinion does not mean that the newspaper endorses the whole issue. As a matter of fact, the first opinion I found was for I-937[1] — Sebastian (talk) 23:14, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Washington Initiative 1029 which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:15, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the move request was: 'not moved. There appears to be no consensus for the proposed moves.' Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:03, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Washington Initiative 937. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071116051103/http://www.msnbc.msn.com:80/default.aspx/id/15652935/ to http://www.msnbc.msn.com/default.aspx/id/15652935/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:53, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]