Talk:2006–07 Bundesliga

Untitled

I have created a table in the same format as I have made for the 2. Bundesliga 2006/07 it can be found in my sandbox, [1], implement it if you wish, but I promise you I will not go ahead and do it like I did last time without discussing the topic first. --shanda 23:50, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Promotion and relegation zone colours

I'm happy to leave them in for the course of the season, but I was wondering how those teams that are promoted and relegated are going to be designated in the table since "P" and "R" are already in there as keys. - Dudesleeper 11:14, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Is it really necessary to include that? I mean it is already included who the promoted teams are in the second paragraph. --shanda 11:32, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

That's not what I was referring to. Say Bayern Munich are crowned champions with six games left - how would that be illustrated in the table? Would you make it Bayern Munich (champions) in the "Team" column or what? Same for those teams promoted with a few games remaining. - Dudesleeper 11:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Never mind. I answered my own question. - Dudesleeper 11:51, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Well if they were crowned champions before the end of the season then they obviously wouldn't be able to move down in the league table, so the 'C' in the notes section would show that they are the champions. Same with the zweite bundesliga, no team can move out of the top if they are officially promoted can they. --shanda 12:48, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

The "C" is already there, two games into the season. That's the point that you're not getting. Same with the 2. Bundesliga table. Right now it looks as though Karlsruhe have already been crowned champions and Duisburg and 1860 Munich have achieved promotion. I say we remove the text in the "Notes" column (but save it elsewhere so it can just be pasted back in later) until the relevant milestones have been achieved. I don't see any point in having them there for the duration of the season. - Dudesleeper 14:39, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Why don't you do it like it's done at Eredivisie 2006/2007 ? SportsAddicted 18:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

It'd be a better idea just to put that 36 games are played before the table is definate, the tags just denote what reward the finisher in the positions gains at the end of the seaons if they continue to stay in that position. It is common on a lot of football tables, I know here in England that on tables on television that they highlight play-off positions and automatic promotions, aswell as the relegation zone. In my opinion it just requires basic football table reading knowledge to that it works that way.

The format of the Eredivisie table is indeed nice and could work well, what do other people think about that style and format? --shanda 18:39, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

I'd say yes. Add a legend/key for the colours but leave the "Notes" column in to confirm champions, European-competition qualification, play-off achievers, relegated teams, etc. as they happen towards the season's end. - Dudesleeper 22:52, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Percentages

Wondering what the consensus would be to change the percentage numbers into fractions for purposes of aesthetics? Example below.

Last updated: October 1st

Pos	Team	P	W	D	L	F	A	GD	Pts	%	Notes
1	Hertha Berlin	6	2	4	0	10	4	+6	10	.555	C CL
2	1. FC Nürnberg	6	2	4	0	7	3	+4	10	.555	CL
3	Werder Bremen	6	3	1	2	13	9	+3	10	.555	CLQ

- Dudesleeper 11:52, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

References

color legend?

Just wondering what the colors meant in the standings table. I think the green and red are obvious, but what about the blue and beige? Perhaps this explaination should be added to the article. // Laughing Man 19:13, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

There should be seperate colors for teams that make the UEFA Champions League Group stage and those that start in the third round. What's the point of having a key which differentiates the situations of the colors are the same (green) for both? That's why I added the yellow coloring for Werder Bremen. Ltv100 16:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

The 3rd green is a shade lighter. No need to change. Kingjeff 17:01, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

A shade lighter? It's virtually indistinguishable. What is the point in not changing? Why not make the difference in the chart clearly readable? Ltv100 18:06, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

I was able to distinguish the 2 shades. Kingjeff 18:13, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Update

Can Someone Update the Bundesliga 2006/07 please

References/Sources

I've been updating the scores table for a few weeks now, but I'd like to add a source note (Kicker.de and Bundesliga.de) for the scores. Is this necessary (common knowledge?)? If so, can someone please create a source section so that I can add the links?

Nils

Image copyright problem with File:Vfb Stuttgart.png

The image File:Vfb Stuttgart.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
• That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --01:03, 19 February 2009 (UTC)