Talk:2002 Iraqi presidential referendum

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Iraq

	Iraq portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wow, not even a single person voted against Saddam...

even by accident. Magic.

80.131.55.167 (talk) 06:47, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So...should we state the obvious?

Clearly this 'election' was as fraudulent as such an exercise could ever be, but should something to that effect be added to the article? Were there statements at the time by the usual international election observers to the effect that the obvious (that it was not fair and free) was true? Naturally any reasonable adult reader will not need such a disclaimer, but for the sake of accessibility and for preventing even one misinterpretation by a reader, ought we not tell the reader that the 'results' already provided in the article are comically illegitimate? Nieuwe Nederlander (talk) 23:09, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a reliable source? 78.82.35.151 (talk) 18:56, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What percentage did Saddam reached in the kurdish areas in the North?

107 percent?

Seriously, why is there is no valid criticism mentioned in the article dealing with this scam election? 80.131.53.4 (talk) 18:26, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious should be stated

Commenting here to remind myself to find a source that acknowledges that this was bogus. Zanahary (talk) 19:29, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done Zanahary (talk) 22:48, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]