Jump to content

Talk:2000 Democratic National Convention protest activity

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:16, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:17, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:17, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

[edit]

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:12, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some garbled language under "Birth of Indymedia"

[edit]

Namely the paragraph the sentence "Other than the dislike from the police that regular citizens had now the capabilities to broadcast media content as easily as mainstream corporate media but in a free-speech, independent fashion, the LAPD had no choice but to release the building to the tenants."

I don't know what the writer is trying to say here, but it is very unclear. The second half makes some sense about free speech, but otherwise it is very garbled. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jkvannort (talk • contribs) 23:07, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2000 Democratic National Convention protest activity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:43, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"D2K" branding?

[edit]

No primary sources allowed, but I remember all of the events and activities and venues were organized under the umbrella of "D2K" - this being, of course, a play on the Y2K issue, but referring to the Democratic National Convention, 2000. Every flyer and program of events and list of resources and email thread and whatever was on the Internet (such as it was back then) was tagged "D2K" for easy search purposes. And yet, when I search for that now, I find everything but that. And yet, I remember it. Somebody help? Davecampbell (talk) 17:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

“Teenage nerds?” Editorialist and amateurish.

[edit]

How can we fix this phrase under section “ Birth of the Independent Media Center”

The usage of the phrase “teenage nerds” stuck out to me as an immature, and quite frankly, unnecessary “detail” UsersLikeYou (talk) 00:54, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What was the point of the protests?

[edit]

Others here have pointed out problems with the general structure of the article in terms of the events it mentions presently, but, from the viewpoint of the average (maybe non-US residing) person, this article looks like a random list of separate protests and organizations without anything linking them together.

Surely there were certain aims or goals among the groups discussed, why are they not included? Why is there no section on their demands or the reasons for the protests? GreyKnighthood (talk) 15:28, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:2000_Democratic_National_Convention_protest_activity&oldid=1259507370"