Talk:2/17th Battalion (Australia)
Appearance
< Talk:2
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2/17th Battalion (Australia) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated A-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2/17th Battalion (Australia) has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
Figures from Johnston
[edit]@AustralianRupert: - G'day. Johnston, That Magnificent 9th, p. 247 gives casualty figures that vary slightly from the AWM, not sure if you want to include as a note to acknowledge the discrepancy. His figures are: 177 KIA and DOW, 3 DOAS, 542 WIA, and 18 POW. He also gives total number of members of the bn during the course of the war as 2,903 (something not currently included in the article). I hope this helps, all the best. Anotherclown (talk) 23:52, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
- Added now, thanks. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 09:54, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- A-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- A-Class Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
- Low-importance Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
- Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- A-Class military history articles
- A-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- Successful requests for military history A-Class review
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles