Talk:2½-ton 6×6 truck

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military land vehicles task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Start

Written in US English with date/month/year, months abbreviated in refs.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sammy D III (talk • contribs) 20:00, March 6, 2016 (UTC)

REO M35 cn

Doyle's 2nd, p.129, first line? P.128 first paragraph has "Ranging from the M35...use". P.111 has "The CCKW was ...than any other WWII-era vehicles", discounting it? Not very strong and only one soure. Sammy D III (talk) 00:37, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

To be a "B" every paragraph has to be refed. I asked Molestash at 5-ton 6x6. On the individual truck sections that would just be repeating the same stuff every para so I didn't do it. I think that is all you have to do to get "promoted". Sammy D III (talk) 13:34, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]