Talk:19th Nervous Breakdown

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject The Rolling Stones, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Rolling Stones on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.The Rolling StonesWikipedia:WikiProject The Rolling StonesTemplate:WikiProject The Rolling StonesThe Rolling Stones articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Fair use rationale for Image:The Rolling Stones - 19th Nervous Breakdown.ogg

Image:The Rolling Stones - 19th Nervous Breakdown.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 16:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Album Inclusion

While it was noted that this song was recorded during the Aftermath sessions the article doesn't mention the full length album that this song first appeared.

PCB —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.171.162.249 (talk) 22:08, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Watch Your Step

I was just listening to Bobby Parker's WATCH YOUR STEP, whose riff inspired several Beatles songs (e.g. I FEEL FINE.) It suddenly struck me that the riff, form, AND break / flourishes were also a source of inspiration for 19th Nervous Breakdown. Has this ever been explored or documented? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.0.187.11 (talk • contribs) 01:25, 6 September 2013 UTC

cover versions?

worthy of a list- no? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.60.219.125 (talk) 14:57, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In the 60s this WAS No 1 in UK. It didn't "break any streak"

It's the same old tired "Record Retailer Revisionism". In the 60s 19th Nervous Breakdown topped the New Musical Express, Melody Maker, and DISC charts. It got a rare perfect score to be Number One on the BBC's Pick Of The Pops and Top Of The Pops. Every newspaper that listed the British Charts listed it as Number One.

Only, the virtually unknown Record Retailer didn't list it as a chart-topper. But this was irrelevant at the time, as under 1 per cent of people even knew that there was a Record Retailer, let alone that it carried a singles chart.

In 1977 the Guinness Book very controversially used the Record Retailer charts. But RS published for years after ignore this. Only when the "OCC" chose to use the Guinness Book's bizarre reinterpretation, did it start to become "real". But somebody in 2024 saying that 19th Nervous Breakdown didn't top the British charts in 1966 shows old-fashioned ignorance, no more no less. 197.87.143.164 (talk) 12:28, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An editor altered the edit, seemingly just because I made it. But, if a bold statement without any citation/source is made, it shouldn't be included. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.87.143.164 (talk) 03:58, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]