Talk:1997 Spring Creek flood/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Tails Wx (talk · contribs) 03:30, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

Reviewer: Riley1012 (talk · contribs) 19:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I will complete an initial review by the end of this week. -Riley1012 (talk) 19:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1. Well-written

• The flood is the worst natural disaster to impact the Fort Collins, Colorado area. There should be a comma after Colorado.

This is the only prose error I found, and this article follows WP:MOS. Well done!

2. Verifiable
Copyvio check passed. This article uses reliable sources and follows the proper reference layout. No unsourced facts.

• Spot check:

  No issue: 4, 7, 12, 13, 17, 18, 23

3. Broad
The article is short but fully covers the event.

4. Neutral
The article is neutral.

5. Stable
This article is stable day-to-day, no edit warring.

6. Illustrated
The image in the article is free and has a relevant caption.

@Tails Wx: I'll go ahead and add the comma and pass as a GA, since that is the only issue I found :). Good job on this article! -Riley1012 (talk) 16:51, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.