Talk:1997–98 Tennessee Lady Volunteers basketball team
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1997–98 Tennessee Lady Volunteers basketball team was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Great article
[edit]I think this is a great article. I wish more people would create more articles like this. Anyway, I have a few suggestions. First, you might want to think about moving the page to a title like "1997-1998 Tennessee Lady Vols basketball team" or perhaps "1997-98 Tennessee Lady Vols basketball team". This will more accurately mimic standards created for sports teams done by other WikiProjects, most notably the Wikipedia:WikiProject College football. For examples, check here: 2007 NCAA Division I FBS football season#See also. Also, I would suggest you create a main Tennessee Lady Vols article, like the one I created for LSU. See: LSU Lady Tigers basketball. If any women's basketball team deserves its own article, then its definitely Tennessee. Seancp 13:58, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Rating
[edit]I agree that this article is quite good. I have a few suggestions and then I would say to nominate it for good article status.
- Some of the tables are a bit rough-looking, especially the Roster section, which shouldn't be in two rows of tables, any way you can compensate for the size of the table and make it fit would be great.
- fix the refs, especially the ones in the headings. It makes the table of contents look unseemly. Just move them to the end of that section.
- I love the prose style. It is quite good and very well referenced. Only thing needed is subheadings for each game (or set of games). As it is, the large blocks of prose are intimidating
Basically, most of what you have left is the easy stuff. The research and the writing is great. Just little technical problems. Wrad 03:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- I think I got all this stuff done, so I'm nominating it. If I'm wrong, I can fix the stuff later anyway, so it's no big deal. Dlong 18:57, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
GA Sweeps
[edit]This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Lampman (talk) 13:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Dead link
[edit]During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.encyclopedia.com/doc/1G1-20483332.html
- In 1997–98 Tennessee Lady Vols basketball team on 2011-05-25 06:31:12, 404 Not Found
- In 1997–98 Tennessee Lady Vols basketball team on 2011-06-08 21:24:46, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 21:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Dead link 2
[edit]During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!
- http://www.ncaa.org/library/records/basketball/w_basketball_records_book/2006/2006_w_basketball_records.pdf
- In 1997–98 Tennessee Lady Vols basketball team on 2011-05-25 06:31:12, 404 Not Found
- In 1997–98 Tennessee Lady Vols basketball team on 2011-06-08 21:24:57, 404 Not Found
--JeffGBot (talk) 21:25, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
GA concerns
[edit]I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are outlined below:
- There are uncited passages throughout the article, including entire paragraphs.
- The lead does not mention all major aspects of the article, as it does not outline major events that happened throughout the season.
Is anyone interested in addressing these concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 15:59, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • GAN review not found
- Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:32, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
There are uncited passages throughout the article, including entire paragraphs. The lead does not mention all major aspects of the article, as it does not outline major events that happened throughout the season. Z1720 (talk) 20:08, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class college basketball articles
- Mid-importance college basketball articles
- WikiProject College basketball articles
- C-Class Basketball articles
- C-Class Women's basketball articles
- Women's basketball task force articles
- WikiProject Basketball articles
- C-Class Tennessee articles
- Low-importance Tennessee articles
- C-Class Women's sport articles
- Low-importance Women's sport articles
- WikiProject Women articles
- Delisted good articles
- Old requests for peer review