Talk:1995 Football League Cup final
Appearance
1995 Football League Cup final has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: October 29, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from 1995 Football League Cup final appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 November 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:1995 Football League Cup Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 16:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
I'll review this asap. Zwerg Nase (talk) 16:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
A solid article on the Football League Cup final 20 years ago. Some things left to sort out:
- Lead: two times you write about "matches" that we "close affairs", which reads pretty repetitive.
- Route to the final: For the Bolton part: You should place the citation at the end of every paragraph. Also, maybe you have sources here for the specific games?
- Route to the final: On my widescreen monitor, the two result tables intersect, leaving a lot of whitespace. You should probably move them both at the end of the section, next to each other. Even better would be if you could convert it into a table such as shown here, that would also give the opportunity to make the prose shorter. But that's optional.
- First half: You should choose a more neutral term that "dominance".
- Details: Any chance to get a source for the match rules?
- Post match: There needs to be a source for the fact that Liverpool qualified for European competition by winning the Cup.
- Optional: You might want to include how Liverpool performed in the European competition the following season.
Good job so far! On hold. Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:23, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
- Since the nominator seems to be on vacation, I was bold and made the changes myself. Zwerg Nase (talk) 14:23, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Sports and recreation good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class football articles
- Low-importance football articles
- GA-Class football in England articles
- Low-importance football in England articles
- Football in England task force articles
- GA-Class Liverpool F.C. articles
- Low-importance Liverpool F.C. articles
- Liverpool F.C. task force articles
- GA-Class football season articles
- WikiProject Football season articles
- WikiProject Football articles