Jump to content

Talk:1992 Football League Fourth Division play-off final

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1992 Football League Fourth Division play-off final has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 7, 2021Good article nomineeListed
September 14, 2021Good topic candidatePromoted
January 24, 2024Good topic removal candidateDemoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 21, 2021.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that both of Scunthorpe United's substitutes failed to score their penalties in the shootout, which saw them lose the 1992 Football League Fourth Division play-off Final?
Current status: Good article

Sources

[edit]

Play-offs

[edit]
  • First legs
  • Bateman, Cynthia (14 May 1992). "Censured Sounness keeps Liverpool job". p. 14. Archived from the original on 11 March 2021. Retrieved 11 March 2021 – via Newspapers.com. second legs (brief)
  • First leg (Times)
  • Second leg (Times)

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 12:32, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(
)

5x expanded by The Rambling Man (talk). Self-nominated at 13:18, 9 April 2021 (UTC).[reply]

  • Hi The Rambling Man, another excellent article in your play-off series that I enjoyed reading (and found educational: I didn't realise that two subs was the limit as late as this). Article more than 5x expanded between 6 and 7 April; article exceeds minimum length and is well written; I didn't spot any issues with overly close paraphrasing from the sources; hook fact is interesting enough, mentioned in the article and checks out to the sources cited; a QPQ has been carried out. Looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 06:20, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:1992 Football League Fourth Division play-off Final/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 16:15, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shall review MWright96 (talk) 16:15, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lead

[edit]
  • "The top three teams of the 1991–92 Football League Fourth Division, Burnley, Rotherham United and Mansfield Town, gained automatic promotion, while the teams placed from fourth to seventh place took part in play-offs." - repetition of "team(s)"
  • What about linking the term "pass" to Passing (association football)?
  • Spot kick would be better off wikilinked to the relevant article
  • "Scunthorpe ended their following season in thirteenth position in the newly renamed Third Division (still the fourth tier of English football)." - how about which remained the fourth tier of English football. so that it's not worded almost exactly the same as in the first sentence of the paragraph this sentence is in?

Route to the final

[edit]
  • "Blackpool finished the regular 1991–92 season in fourth place in the Football League Fourth Division, the fourth tier of the English football league system, one place and four points ahead of Scunthorpe United." - repetition of "place"
  • "Blackpool faced Barnet in the other semi-final and the first match was played on 10 May 1992 at Underhill in London." - requires verification since Underhill is not mentioned in the source attached to this text
  • Wikilink the term crosses to the appropriate article

Summary

[edit]
  • "Tony Rodwell made an opportunity for Bamber but he missed." - what opportunity?
  • How about wikilinking the term "pass" to Passing (association football) only on the first mention?
  • Penalty shootout will need to be wikilinked for non-Football readers

Details

[edit]
  • No references to verify the match details?

Post-match

[edit]
  • "Scunthorpe ended their following season in thirteenth position in the newly renamed Third Division (still the fourth tier of English football)." - same query as the fourth one in the lead section

Am putting the review on hold to allow the nominator to address or query what has been raised above MWright96 (talk) 18:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MWright96 all addressed, many thanks for your review! The Rambling Man (Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!) 10:08, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@The Rambling Man: Now promoting to GA class MWright96 (talk) 17:35, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:1992_Football_League_Fourth_Division_play-off_final&oldid=1203437698"