Talk:1990 ARCO explosion/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 05:09, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

There are only a few copy changes needed for this article to make GA. JJonahJackalope, this will go on a 7-day hold; ping me when the copy changes are done. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:28, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copy changes

Background

First paragraph: move the period after the quotation marks. We use logical quotation, which does differ from usual American English.
- Done.

Aftermath

First sentence in the first section and the fourth and fifth sentences in the second section need the same logical quotation fix as above. The other quotes are fine with their punctuation since it applies to the quoted material.
- Done.
"Beaumont, Texas" needs a MOS:GEOCOMMA following it.
- Done.
"July 23, 1990" needs a MOS:DATECOMMA following it.
- Done.
Consider linking Process hazard analysis, which would help with the few links in that section.
- Done.
"largescale" should be written "large-scale"
- Done.

Other items

The lone image is PD and alt-tagged.
References are archived.
Earwig throws some high-ish copyvio numbers due to quotes and organizational names (esp. OSHA), but there are in actuality no issues.

Sammi Brie, just wanted to ping you to let you know that edits have been made to the article to address the comments and requests in this review. Thank you again for starting this review, and if you have any further questions, comments, or concerns, please reach out. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 15:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good; I see all the changes made. Passing for GA. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:45, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]