Talk:1987 Superstition Hills earthquakes

1987 Superstition Hills earthquakes has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 14, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Earthquakes Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: 50,000 Challenge Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was created or improved during this WikiProject's 50,000 Challenge, which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help!

Disaster management Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Orphaned references in 1987 Superstition Hills earthquakes

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 1987 Superstition Hills earthquakes's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ISC-GEM":

From 1992 Big Bear earthquake: ISC (January 19, 2015), ISC-GEM Global Instrumental Earthquake Catalogue (1900–2009), Version 2.0, International Seismological Centre
From 2003 San Simeon earthquake: ISC (2014), ISC-GEM Global Instrumental Earthquake Catalogue (1900–2009), Version 1.05, International Seismological Centre
From 1981 Westmorland earthquake: ISC (2015), ISC-GEM Global Instrumental Earthquake Catalogue (1900–2009), Version 4.0, International Seismological Centre
From 1933 Long Beach earthquake: ISC (2015), ISC-GEM Global Instrumental Earthquake Catalogue (1900–2009), Version 2.0, International Seismological Centre, archived from the original on 2019-05-20, retrieved 2015-07-12
From 1990 Upland earthquake: ISC (2016), ISC-GEM Global Instrumental Earthquake Catalogue (1900–2012), Version 3.0, International Seismological Centre
From 1999 Hector Mine earthquake: ISC (2017), ISC-GEM Global Instrumental Earthquake Catalogue (1900–2013), Version 4.0, International Seismological Centre, archived from the original on 2016-11-25, retrieved 2017-02-08
From 1987 Ecuador earthquakes: ISC (19 January 2015), ISC-GEM Global Instrumental Earthquake Catalogue (1900–2009), Version 2.0, International Seismological Centre
From 1973 Point Mugu earthquake: ISC (2017), ISC-GEM Global Instrumental Earthquake Catalogue (1900–2013), Version 4.0, International Seismological Centre
From 1931 Valentine earthquake: ISC (2015), ISC-GEM Global Instrumental Earthquake Catalogue (1900–2009), Version 2.0, International Seismological Centre

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:53, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:34, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:1987 Superstition Hills earthquakes/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Dora the Axe-plorer (talk · contribs) 10:10, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Sammi Brie (talk · contribs) 02:31, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Just take a fresh look, check it, maybe add some city links, and that's about it. You might want to harmonize citation templates, but that's not a GA issue. Ping me when addressed. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sammi Brie Hi, I'm done addressing your pointers. Though could you point out the citation styles you're referring to? I may be missing something. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 04:57, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? If you fancy doing so, I always have plenty of GA nominees to review. Just look for the all-uppercase titles in the Television section. Reviews always appreciated.

Copy changes

Consider linking cities in lead.

Done Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 03:51, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed some missing or redundant words.

Done Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 04:54, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Some of your semicolon uses call for colons or commas. Semicolons are most often used with lists that contain items with commas or to connect otherwise separate sentences.

Done Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 04:56, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sourcing and spot checks

Not a GA item, but I notice a mix of citation styles 1 and 2 here.

Reviewed: 4, 12, 14, 18, 20. No issues.

I'm not sure I understand what do you mean here. Can you clarify? Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 03:35, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

- - Read Help:Citation Style 1 for some context. I cleaned this up with a minor edit. It wasn't necessary for GA, but I figured I'd address it since I noticed. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:32, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Images

The shakemap is PD-USGov. Encouragement: Add alt text, in this case summarizing where the shaking was centered.

I've added an alt text. regarding the first point, PD-USGov-USGS is created specifically for USGS content, I don't see need to generalize under PD-USGov Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 03:18, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was being generic with the licensing mention. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 05:14, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.