Talk:1981 Peach Bowl (January)

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

College football Low‑importance

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Georgia (U.S. state): Atlanta Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state)

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Atlanta task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Atlanta task force To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate Atlanta related articles from Unassessed Atlanta articles and Category:Unknown-importance Atlanta articles.
Citing sources : Unreferenced Atlanta articles
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category, the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects.
Infobox : Atlanta articles without infoboxes
Map : Wikipedia requested maps in Atlanta
Photo : Wikipedia requested photographs in Atlanta
Stubs : Work on stubs in Category:Atlanta stubs.
Other : * Help out with articles placed in Category:Atlanta articles needing attention
- Add {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)|class=|importance=|atlanta=|atlanta-importance=}} project banner to Atlanta-related articles to talk pages and assess.
- Maintain and further improve articles already of high-quality.
- Get Atlanta into Featured article status.
- Improve groups of articles to meet the standards for a Good or Featured Topic.

WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Crooked Creek (Georgia), Ed Defore Sports Complex, Audery Mill Creek, More (Georgia)... More (U.S.)...
Assess : Rate articles from Unassessed Georgia (U.S. state) articles and Unknown-importance Georgia (U.S. state) articles.
Citing sources : Unreferenced Georgia (U.S. state) articles
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category.
Geographical coordinates : more Georgia (U.S. state) articles missing geocoordinate data
Infobox : Georgia (U.S. state) articles without infoboxes
Map : Wikipedia requested maps in Georgia (U.S. state)
Photo : Wikipedia requested photographs in Georgia (U.S. state)
Stubs : Work on stubs in articles in Georgia (U.S. state) stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) radio station stubs, Georgia (U.S. state) road stubs and Georgia (U.S. state) geography stubs.
Other : *Deletion sorting: Please see the collection of discussions on the deletion of articles related to Georgia (U.S. state) - compiled by WikiProject Deletion sorting
- Help out with articles placed in Category:Georgia (U.S. state) articles needing attention
- Notability: Articles with notability concerns, listed at WikiProject Notability
- Tag the talk pages of Georgia (U.S. state)-related articles with the {{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)}} banner.
- Get Georgia (U.S. state) to a featured article quality standard

1981 Peach Bowl (January) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 6, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
September 22, 2009	Featured topic candidate	Promoted
March 31, 2010	Featured topic removal candidate	Demoted
August 31, 2011	Good topic candidate	Promoted
Current status: Good article

Untitled

Just a quick note. I'll do the GA review shortly, but before I do, could you make an article on the 1981 Peach Bowl that occurred in December? It just seems off to have a redlinked disambiguation header. It can be a stub, that's fine. Gives you something quick to work on while I review the whole article. Wizardman 16:53, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1981 Peach Bowl (January)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

The article is actually really good, there's only a few minor things I'd like to see fixed:

~~Write an article on the December Peach Bowl (can be a substub, so long as the article exists).~~ Taken care of.
~~Can the image Image:1970s_Peach_Bowl_logo.jpg be reduced in size? 500x417 is rather big for a logo that only needs to be maybe half that size.~~ Taken care of, nevermind.
Make sure football players with articles are linked (i think i got most of them)

Found a few more. JKBrooks85 (talk) 22:27, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"From there, it took Miami just four plays to score. Roan ran for seven yards, Kelly completed an 11-yard pass, threw an interception, then Hobbs ran 12 yards for the touchdown." I assume you meant incompletion as opposed to interception? If not I presume the interception was negated somehow, which would need a mention.

Thanks for the catch. It was an incomplete pass.

In the statistical section, you have Miami with 3 turnovers, VT with 1. Elsewhere in the article it says Miami turned it over 4 times, and you mention at least 2 VT interceptions.

Great catch! For whatever reason, my copy of the box score only lists Casey's interception for Tech and doesn't mention Lawrence's errant pass. It's there in the play-by-play, but not in the statistical summary. Interesting. I checked it against my copy of the game tape, though, and the Washington Post story is correct -- Miami had four turnovers and Tech two, off of the two interceptions. JKBrooks85 (talk) 22:18, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Besides that stuff, this article's well written. The three things left are all minor stuff so getting it handled shouldn't be an issue. Wizardman 19:16, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I have no other issues with the article, so I'll gladly pass it now. :) Wizardman 00:10, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]