Jump to content

Talk:1981 Peach Bowl (January)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article1981 Peach Bowl (January) has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 6, 2008Good article nomineeListed
September 22, 2009Featured topic candidatePromoted
March 31, 2010Featured topic removal candidateDemoted
August 31, 2011Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Just a quick note. I'll do the GA review shortly, but before I do, could you make an article on the 1981 Peach Bowl that occurred in December? It just seems off to have a redlinked disambiguation header. It can be a stub, that's fine. Gives you something quick to work on while I review the whole article. Wizardman 16:53, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:1981 Peach Bowl (January)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

The article is actually really good, there's only a few minor things I'd like to see fixed:

  • Write an article on the December Peach Bowl (can be a substub, so long as the article exists). Taken care of.
  • Can the image Image:1970s_Peach_Bowl_logo.jpg be reduced in size? 500x417 is rather big for a logo that only needs to be maybe half that size. Taken care of, nevermind.
  • Make sure football players with articles are linked (i think i got most of them)
  • "From there, it took Miami just four plays to score. Roan ran for seven yards, Kelly completed an 11-yard pass, threw an interception, then Hobbs ran 12 yards for the touchdown." I assume you meant incompletion as opposed to interception? If not I presume the interception was negated somehow, which would need a mention.
  • Thanks for the catch. It was an incomplete pass.
  • In the statistical section, you have Miami with 3 turnovers, VT with 1. Elsewhere in the article it says Miami turned it over 4 times, and you mention at least 2 VT interceptions.
  • Great catch! For whatever reason, my copy of the box score only lists Casey's interception for Tech and doesn't mention Lawrence's errant pass. It's there in the play-by-play, but not in the statistical summary. Interesting. I checked it against my copy of the game tape, though, and the Washington Post story is correct -- Miami had four turnovers and Tech two, off of the two interceptions. JKBrooks85 (talk) 22:18, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Besides that stuff, this article's well written. The three things left are all minor stuff so getting it handled shouldn't be an issue. Wizardman 19:16, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I have no other issues with the article, so I'll gladly pass it now. :) Wizardman 00:10, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1981 Peach Bowl (January). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:26, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1981 Peach Bowl (January). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:10, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:1981_Peach_Bowl_(January)&oldid=1196199650"