Talk:1978 European Super Cup/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Good888 (talk · contribs) 18:12, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Might as well take a look at this.

Lead

I would suggest linking Brussels.
- Done NapHit (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Background

I would link Austrian and German under Austria and Germany respectively.
- WP:OVERLINK states "the names of major geographic features and locations" should not be linked. NapHit (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"the tie went to extra-time" Link extra-time if possible.
- Done NapHit (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Mention that Nottingham Forest were an English side.
- Done NapHit (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
"and 0–0 draw in the second leg" a 0-0 draw.
- Done NapHit (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First leg

"and the referee blew for full-time" State that the referee was Károly Palotai.
- Done NapHit (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Noticed that the Man of the Match and Assistant Referees are blank. Who were they?
- I don't have this information and can't find it anywhere unfortunately, so I've removed these. NapHit (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Add the match rules as well.
If you can, add an image of the Line-ups. Something like this.
- I don't have the software or the expertise to produce one of those unfortunately. NapHit (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Second leg

You already linked Bob Paisley in the First leg section.
- Delinked NapHit (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Same suggestions like the First Leg section. A Line-Up image, the match rules and noting who were the Man of the Match and Assistant Referees (if they were any), would be useful.
- See above NapHit (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Post-match

Add how Anderlecht did in the 1979–80 UEFA Cup and how Liverpool did in the European Cup.
- I'm not sure it's relevant, given that it is outside the season in question. I think stating that they qualified is enough NapHit (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

References

Using Checklinks, I have found that no references are broken.
Link UEFA, Rec.Sport.Soccer Statistics Foundation, The Guardian, Liverpool Daily Post and Liverpool Echo.
- Linking publisher is personal preference and I prefer no to, so I'll leave these as they are. NapHit (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Too many full stops in Rec.Sport.Soccer Statistics Foundation. There should be only two. Also, shouldn't it be abbreviated to RSSSF?
- Done NapHit (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links

Unlink RSSSF, considering it will be linked in the References section.
- I've removed the section as it's not necessary. NapHit (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, this is a decent article. Placing on hold for now. Good888 (talk) 18:12, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the review @Good888:, I've addressed all your comments. NapHit (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@NapHit: Once you have addressed the match rules issue, then I will promote it. Good888 (talk) 19:14, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm actually not sure what the match rules were. For instance I don't know how many substitutions the teams were allowed to make, so I'm reluctant to add that info as well, as it could constitute original research. NapHit (talk) 19:30, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@NapHit: I would recommend getting somebody to make the line-up image. Even though that needs to be done, I think the article is good enough for GA status now. Good888 (talk) 13:03, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]