Talk:1970s in Hong Kong

Hong Kong High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (19)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (297)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,067)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,518) • Stub-Class articles (6,676)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (379) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,339)

British Empire

	British Empire portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject British Empire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of British Empire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.British EmpireWikipedia:WikiProject British EmpireTemplate:WikiProject British EmpireBritish Empire
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Focus

This page has lost its focus. A rewrite is required. -- Jerry Crimson Mann 10:54, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

1950s,1960s, etc.

This would be nice to write a series of Hong Kong's history of the last century. :) -- Jerry Crimson Mann 11:49, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

What about a timeline? — Insta ntnood 15:44, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)

I'd like to make that stuff. In fact, I have been mapping out the entire thing of late, putting a blank link in the page "History oif Hong Kong. PZFUN deleted it nevertheless. :'-( -- Jerry Crimson Mann 15:50, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Be bold and go ahead to lay out the framework of the timeline. You can take a look at other timelines, say timeline of Taiwanese history, and get some ideas. :-) — Insta ntnood 20:05, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)

I'll take up the 50's - 80's and shall be starting them in these two weeks. Trust me, I have been reading loads about them these days (lucky me!)... Maybe I'll start those articles and let us add our knowledge to it? CrossTimer 04:20, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Lovely :) -- Jerry Crimson Mann 05:16, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Great. Obviously these articles are needed on Wikipedia. :-) Right... the 80s would perhaps be slightly overlapped with the transition article that Jerry has been working on. Any thoughts? — Insta ntnood 10:35, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)

(original message on User talk:Warofdreams) The word "the" as in "The 1990s in Hong Kong", "The 1970s in Hong Kong" etc. has a special meaning. Please don't erase the word from the title. Deryck C. from Hong Kong, 12:26, 25 July 2005 (UTC).[reply]

I didn't mean to start any arguments; I assumed the article had been started by someone unaware that all similar articles omit "the" from their titles - e.g. 1970s in film or 1840s in sports. What special meaning does "the" have in the title of this article? Warofdreams 12:38, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(also on User talk:Warofdreams) Just custom. In Hong Kong, everybody says "The 1990s" instead of simply "1990s". Therefore to conform the wikipedian custom (use British spelling and usage in Britain related articles, Aussie spelling and usage in Australian articles, similarly use Hong Kong-style wordings in Hong Kong related articles) the word the is put into the article series: The 1960s in Hong Kong, The 1970s in Hong Kong, The 1990s in Hong Kong. Much thanks for agreeing to talk with me and much thanks if you'll not do that retitling again. Deryck C. 12:46, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your explanation and my apologies for moving the articles without discussion. I am, however, not convinced by your argument. For instance, in the UK we always refer to the country as the United Kingdom, and yet the article on the nation is of course at "United Kingdom". Similarly, we have the River Thames and, indeed, the 1990s. As a result, I'm planning to list the pages on WP:RM. -Warofdreams

Right.. Deryck, it's actually a naming convention (or manual of style?) that the word "the" in the beginning of the title without specific meaning should be dropped. :-D — Insta ntnood 14:45, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

Yes, I've found the convention at Wikipedia:Naming conventions#Avoid the definite article ("the") and the indefinite article ("a"/"an") at the beginning of the page name. - Warofdreams 16:15, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks. Now I'm turning to support. The naming convention rule should be over the "do in rome what the romans do" rule. Deryc k C. 17:26, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Page move?

For this article, and also the 1950s in Hong Kong, the 1960s in Hong Kong and the 1990s in Hong Kong to 1970s in Hong Kong, etc.

Support - see discussion above. Warofdreams 13:46, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Jerry Crimson Mann 13:58, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ -- I'll support this naming convention only when somebody can prove most other articles that concerns things with a "the" does not have the word in the article title. Deryck C. 16:07, 25 July 2005 (UTC) Turn to support as adequate proof is given by Warofdreams on the wikipedian official naming convention policy. Deryck C. 16:28, 25 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been renamed after the result of a move request. violet/riga (t) 19:29, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Natural disasters

Does anyone remember typhoon Hope? I think it was in 1979. I was at home and could see cars being blown all over the place by the winds, before we decided to hide in an insider corridor in our apartment in the New Territories. --tess 22:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is an article on it. I linked it. Benjwong 03:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Info and Pictures

Couple facts need reconsidering or re-research before going back in the article.

1.) burger king in HK did not come before mcdonalds. I looked all over and the 1st burger king in asia was singerpore 1982. If this is not correct, please find a resource to show it.

2.) Largest reservior seems to be plover cove in every construction source. Not Highland Island Reservior.

3.) ultraman is not anime, if anything it is closer to sentai material

4.) The golden age of Hong Kong football was not the 70s. Unless you count the 1914 HKFA, in that case it would be colonial times.

5.) There is no article on "The Private Eye". That picture is also absolutely horrible! I got rid of it. Feel free to upload some other picture.

6.) 60s watergun pic has moved to the 60s page.

Benjwong 04:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Doctorwc (talk) 04:20, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Our family migrated to Australia in 1974 and I have already seen Ultraman on TV several times. I think the first broadcast of Ultraman in Hong Kong was well before 1975.

About the metric quote

That quote "1 feet equals 3 feet" (一呎等如三尺) was there before me. I took it out. If someone wants to find a real reference for it and put it back, feel free. Benjwong 01:55, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1970s in Hong Kong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070213192705/http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/schenk.HongKong to http://eh.net/encyclopedia/article/schenk.HongKong

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:05, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]