Talk:1965 South Vietnamese coup

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 1965 South Vietnamese coup article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Asian / Southeast Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Vietnam Low‑importance

	Vietnam portal This article is part of WikiProject Vietnam, an attempt to create a comprehensive, neutral, and accurate representation of Vietnam on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.VietnamWikipedia:WikiProject VietnamTemplate:WikiProject VietnamVietnam articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 21, 2010	WikiProject A-class review	Approved

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 16, 2010.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that US Ambassador Maxwell D. Taylor encouraged a 1965 overthrow of South Vietnam's Nguyen Khanh, and the first attempt was then made by the communist agent Pham Ngoc Thao?

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 19, 2014, February 19, 2015, and February 19, 2019.

Orphaned references in 1965 South Vietnamese coup

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of 1965 South Vietnamese coup's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "kh232":

From Nguyen Chanh Thi: Kahin (1986), p. 232.
From September 1964 South Vietnamese coup attempt: Kahin, p. 232.

Reference named "kh498":

From Nguyen Chanh Thi: Kahin (1986), p. 498.
From September 1964 South Vietnamese coup attempt: Kahin, p. 498.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:08, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

Direct links to the New York Times and Time articles are in the history. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 11:16, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?_r=1&res=F60D13F73A5B1B728DDDAD0994D1405B848AF1D3}}
- In 1965 South Vietnamese coup on 2011-05-25 03:54:08, 404 Not found
- In 1965 South Vietnamese coup on 2011-06-06 13:13:49, 404 Not found

--JeffGBot (talk) 13:14, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dead link 2

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?_r=2&res=F40611FB355C147A93C2AB1789D85F418685F9}}
- In 1965 South Vietnamese coup on 2011-05-25 03:54:08, 404 Not found
- In 1965 South Vietnamese coup on 2011-06-06 13:14:00, 404 Not found

--JeffGBot (talk) 13:14, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]