Talk:1952 World Snooker Championship/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 18:25, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Shall review for the July 2021 GAN Backlog Drive MWright96 (talk) 18:25, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Lead
[edit]- "The 1952 World Snooker Championship was a snooker tournament held between Monday 25 February and Saturday 8 March 1952" - the days aren't really needed here
- Changed. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- "at Houldsworth Hall in Manchester, England" - comma missing after the word "Hall"
- Changed. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- "In winning the event, Lindrum became the first player from outside the British Isles to win the tournament," - repetition of "win"
- Changed. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- "with some only counting Robertson's win due to the field of just two players." - what is meant by "some" in this context?
- Sorry, Historians. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Background
[edit]- "Due to a dispute between the Professional Billiards Players' Association (PBPA) and the organisers for the event, the Billiards Association and Control Council (BACC), most players withdrew from the event." - repetition of "event"
- Covered Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- Wikilink the term frame to the relevant article only on the first mention not on any other subsequent mentions
- Covered Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- The term round-robin will also be wikilinked to the correct article
- "McConachy had performed badly, losing all eight matches"' - McConachy was defeated in each of the eight games he played
- Covered Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- The Wikilink of the BACC in the third paragraph is unneeded but the word table can be to Billiard table
Summary
[edit]- "Lindrum won eight of the next twelve to lead 14–10 after the second day's play." - a word is missing from this sentence
- "Day five featured Lindrum extend his lead to 38–22 after day five," - The fifth day saw
- "needing just two of the remaining 37 for victory." - a word is missing from this excerpt
- "Lindrum won the first two frames to reach a winning 73–37 position on the 6 March."- on 6 March. per MOS:DATES
- "The remaining 35 "dead" frames were due to be played," - dead frames
- "Lindrum became the first player from outside the British Isles to win the World Championship, and would remain the only one until compatriot Neil Robertson won the event in 2010.[22]" - the fact of Robertson's 2010 victory will need an additional reliable source to verify it along with the one already at the end of this sentence
- All covered. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:56, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
References
[edit]- References 1, 7 and 11 are missing their page numbers
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:56, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- References 2 and 23 are duplicates of each other
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:56, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- References 7, 20, 22, 26 and 27 should mention that they are from Trove using the via= field
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:56, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- References 4, 6 and 12 to 19 and 21 should mention they were from Google Newspapers using the via= field
- Done Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:56, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- The work in Reference 20 should be cleaned up to say The Mercury not "Mercury (Hobart, Tas. : 1860 – 1954)"
- Done this one. Will pick up the remainder when at a PC. Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 19:59, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Am putting the review on hold to allow the nominator to address or query each of the points raised above MWright96 (talk) 19:04, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
- I think that's everything covered now MWright96. Thanks for the review once again Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:56, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- @Lee Vilenski: Have made various changes to two incomplete refs; now promoting this article to GA status MWright96 (talk) 15:45, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
- I think that's everything covered now MWright96. Thanks for the review once again Best Wishes, Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 14:56, 10 July 2021 (UTC)