Talk:1947 Rawalpindi massacres/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lingzhi.Renascence (talk · contribs) 14:45, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi. I'll take a look at this. It might take 2 or 3 weeks. § Lingzhi (talk) 14:45, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks. It’s my first time at GA and I have little idea what to expect. Perhaps I also chose a bad time for the nom (I may be going away temporarily soon), if the problems with the article require significant time to fix I may ask you to fail it for the time being. UnpetitproleX (talk) 19:33, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

@Lingzhi.Renascence: actually, I’ve come to realise the article probably needs more work, and a peer review before a nom at GA. I’d like to withdraw the nomination. Per instructions, the withdrawal requires that you fail the nomination, please do so. Best, UnpetitproleX (talk) 23:47, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

@UnpetitproleX: OK then. Ping me when it goes into WP:PR. I'll chip in and help. § Lingzhi (talk) 00:04, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Will do! UnpetitproleX (talk) 00:08, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

   b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a. (reference section):

   b. (citations to reliable sources):

   c. (OR):

   d. (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a. (major aspects):

   b. (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

   b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)