Jump to content

Talk:1935 SMU vs. TCU football game

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:1935 SMU vs. TCU football game/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Kaiser matias (talk · contribs) 15:59, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this shortly. Kaiser matias (talk) 15:59, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  • I feel the two schools names should be spelled out in the lead, rather than using the abbreviations.
    • Added full school names to lead.
  • "Their game against the Bruins on November 11 was especially noteworthy, as it attracted a crowd of about 50,000 people at the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum to watch the Mustangs' spread offense lead them to a 21–0 victory over the local team." Is the 50,000 attendance high or low for this type of game? Best to note something to quantity that (it was the highest attendance for UCLA in so long, record for the season, etc).
    • I could not find any information from the source material indicating the significance of either the attendance or the score, so I have edited the sentence.
  • Any reason North Texas State Teachers Eagles does not link to North Texas Mean Green football?
    • Added link to North Texas Mean Green football.
  • The captions for the Rose and Sugar Bowl (in the "Afermath" section) should specify what stadium is what (ex. Rose Bowl (left; pictured 1926) and so on).
    • Added directions to images.

Otherwise I don't see much else to note here. More images would of course be nice, but I do understand that can be limited. A really high-quality article here, and will be happy to pass once the above are addressed. Kaiser matias (talk) 23:50, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I've put the article on hold, and while I know that notes seven days to complete things, I am not going to fail if you need more time, as I understand people can be busy. Kaiser matias (talk) 23:51, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Kaiser matias, I just wanted to reach out to let you know that I have completed some edits to the page to address some of the concerns you raised in your review. Thanks for starting this review, and if you have any further questions, comments, or concerns, please reach out. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 17:20, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Good work, happy to pass now. Kaiser matias (talk) 15:36, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk02:59, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Improved to Good Article status by JJonahJackalope (talk). Self-nominated at 17:40, 11 June 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/1935 SMU vs. TCU football game; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems

Hook eligibility:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: @JJonahJackalope: Good article, but I don't really see the hook as being that interesting. Could you propose a new one?

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Onegreatjoke (talkcontribs) 01:09, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Going to wait for OGJ's opinion. It's not an amazing hook but I think it's better than the original. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 16:18, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It's definitely a much better hook. Onegreatjoke (talk) 17:48, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@BeanieFan11, Onegreatjoke, and Narutolovehinata5: Apologies for the late response, but the new hook definitely looks better than the original in my opinion, thank you for adding it! -JJonahJackalope (talk) 19:25, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]